The foldable phone market is heating up, with the Huawei nova Flip S and the Motorola Razr+ 2025 representing compelling options at different price points. This comparison dissects their core components – from processing power to battery endurance – to determine which device delivers the best experience for various user needs. We'll focus on the real-world implications of each phone's specifications, moving beyond simple number comparisons.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a more powerful processor, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset and impressive 10:12 hour active use battery score outweigh the Huawei nova Flip S’s faster 66W charging, making it the better choice for demanding tasks and extended use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 17 | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 25 | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Aluminum alloy frame, glass back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 169.8 x 75.4 x 6.9 mmFolded: 87.8 x 75.4 x 15.1 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 195 g or 199 g (6.88 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1136 x 2690 pixels (~421 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.94 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Kirin 8030 | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 735 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 5.1 | Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 100% in 40 min
5W reverse wired | 45W wired
15W wireless
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Pink, White, Black, Nova Black, Blue | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | PSD-AL80 | XT2451-1 |
| Price | About 410 EUR | $ 500.00 |
Huawei nova Flip S
- Faster 66W wired charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Compact and stylish flip phone design
- Less powerful Kirin 8030 chipset
- Likely shorter battery life compared to Razr+
- Potentially less advanced camera system
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor
- Excellent 10:12 hour active use battery life
- 15W wireless charging support
- Slower 45W wired charging
- Likely higher price tag
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Motorola)
Display Comparison
While both devices are flip phones, detailed display specs are missing. However, given the Razr+'s positioning, it likely features an LTPO panel for adaptive refresh rates, maximizing battery efficiency. The nova Flip S, positioned as a more value-oriented option, may utilize a standard OLED panel. Bezels and color accuracy will be key differentiators, but without specific data, it's difficult to assess. The Razr+'s external display is also likely larger and more functional, a common trend in Motorola's foldable designs.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are unavailable for both devices. However, given the market positioning, the Razr+ 2025 is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and improved image processing capabilities. Motorola typically focuses on computational photography, leveraging software to enhance image quality. The nova Flip S may prioritize affordability, potentially resulting in a less advanced camera setup. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is notable; its presence on the Razr+ would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording.
Performance
The Motorola Razr+ 2025 boasts the Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm), a significant advantage over the Huawei nova Flip S’s Kirin 8030. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon chip translates to superior thermal efficiency and power management, reducing throttling during intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s octa-core configuration (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) provides a clear performance lead, particularly in GPU-intensive applications like gaming. The Kirin 8030, while an octa-core processor, lacks the architectural advantages and process node refinement of the Snapdragon, resulting in lower sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr+ 2025 shines in battery performance, achieving a 10:12 hour active use score. This indicates a well-optimized combination of hardware and software. While the Huawei nova Flip S offers faster 66W wired charging (100% in 40 minutes), the Razr+'s longer battery life mitigates the need for frequent charging. The Razr+ also includes 15W wireless charging, a convenience feature absent from the nova Flip S’s charging profile. Both phones offer 5W reverse wired charging, useful for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova Flip S if you prioritize rapid charging and a potentially lower price point. Its 66W wired charging will get you back to 100% in just 40 minutes, ideal for users who frequently need a quick power boost. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you value sustained performance, longer battery life, and a more modern chipset. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers a significant advantage for gaming, multitasking, and future-proofing your investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Kirin 8030 in the Huawei nova Flip S struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Kirin 8030 is a capable mid-range chipset, but it will likely exhibit throttling and reduced frame rates in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact compared to the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Razr+. Expect to lower graphics settings for a smoother experience.
❓ How does the 45W charging on the Motorola Razr+ 2025 compare to the 66W charging on the Huawei nova Flip S in real-world usage?
While the nova Flip S charges faster on paper, the Razr+'s superior battery life means you'll likely need to charge it less frequently. The convenience of faster charging is offset by the need to plug in more often.
❓ Is the 5W reverse wired charging on either phone powerful enough to significantly charge a smartwatch or earbuds?
5W reverse wired charging is primarily intended for emergency top-ups of small accessories like earbuds or smartwatches. It's not a substitute for a dedicated charger and will take a considerable amount of time to fully charge a device.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs, what should potential buyers focus on when evaluating the camera performance of these phones?
Look for sample photos and videos taken in various lighting conditions. Pay attention to dynamic range, color accuracy, and detail preservation. Reviews that specifically compare image processing styles will be particularly helpful.
