Huawei nova 8 SE 4G vs Oppo Reno5 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Oppo Reno5 5G is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset offers significantly better performance and future-proofing with 5G, while maintaining comparable charging speeds and battery endurance to the nova 8 SE. The Huawei device remains a viable option for those prioritizing a lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei nova 8 SE 4G | Oppo Reno5 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 26 | 2020, December 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 26 | Available. Released 2021, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 74.8 x 7.5 mm (6.36 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 159.1 x 73.4 x 7.9 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 172 g or 180 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Kirin 710A (14 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, Panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 3800 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Aurora, Silver | Galactic Silver, Azure Blue, Starry Black |
| Models | JSC-AL50 | PEGM00, PEGT00, CPH2145 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.4 LUFS (Below average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 317762(v8) GeekBench: 1813 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei nova 8 SE 4G
- 66W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially lower price point
- Streamlined user experience (typical of Huawei)
- Older Kirin 710A chipset offers lower performance
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Limited display information
Oppo Reno5 5G
- Snapdragon 765G provides superior performance
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- May be slightly more expensive
- Battery capacity not specified
- Reverse charging may not be useful for all users
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno5 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 634 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the nova 8 SE (brightness unspecified). While both likely utilize OLED panels for vibrant colors, the Reno5 5G’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal) for the Reno5 5G, typical of OLED technology. The absence of detailed display specs for the nova 8 SE makes a direct comparison difficult, but it’s reasonable to assume the Reno5 5G offers a superior viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. However, given Oppo’s historical focus on camera technology, it’s reasonable to expect the Reno5 5G to offer more refined image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess video stabilization capabilities. We can assume both phones will have a standard set of camera modes, but the Reno5 5G likely has an edge in overall image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno5 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) is a clear upgrade over the Huawei nova 8 SE 4G’s Kirin 710A (14nm). The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 765G provides superior power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 765G’s CPU configuration – a Kryo 475 Prime core at 2.4 GHz, a Kryo 475 Gold core at 2.2 GHz, and six Kryo 475 Silver cores at 1.8 GHz – is architecturally more advanced than the Kirin 710A’s Cortex-A73/A53 combination. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the Reno5 5G. The Reno5 5G also benefits from 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the nova 8 SE.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve a respectable endurance rating of 109 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the unspecified mAh capacity of the nova 8 SE. However, the Reno5 5G’s 65W charging, capable of a full charge in 35 minutes, is complemented by reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the nova 8 SE. The nova 8 SE also offers 66W charging, suggesting comparable charging speeds, but the Reno5 5G’s added reverse charging functionality provides added versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 8 SE 4G if you need a reliable smartphone with exceptionally fast 66W charging and are operating in an area without 5G infrastructure. Buy the Oppo Reno5 5G if you prioritize future-proof connectivity with 5G, smoother performance for demanding apps and games, and a brighter display for outdoor visibility.