Realme GT 5G vs Huawei nova 8 Pro 5G: A Head-to-Head Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and gaming, the Realme GT 5G is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 888. However, the Huawei nova 8 Pro 5G offers a compelling alternative with its fast 66W charging and a potentially more refined software experience, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei nova 8 Pro 5G | Realme GT 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 83, 84 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| EDGE | Yes | - |
| GPRS | Yes | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 23. Released 2021, January 08 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 74.1 x 7.9 mm (6.43 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 158.5 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (Glass) / 9.1 mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1236 x 2676 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~439 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~91.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.84 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Kirin 985 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 (8-core) | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 3.15 MP | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | VGA | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, White | Gold/Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | BRQ-AN00, BRQ-AL00 | RMX2202 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| SAR | 1.25 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 703986 (v8), 810433 (v9) GeekBench: 3555 (v5.1) GFXBench: 55fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei nova 8 Pro 5G
- 66W fast charging with 35-minute full charge time
- Potentially refined Huawei software experience
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessories
- Kirin 985 chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 888
- Limited information on camera sensor specs
Realme GT 5G
- Snapdragon 888 5G delivers flagship-level performance
- 65W fast charging with 35-minute full charge time
- High peak brightness for excellent outdoor visibility
- Snapdragon 888 is prone to thermal throttling
- Image processing may be less refined than Huawei
Display Comparison
Both devices offer a premium visual experience, but differ in key specs. The Realme GT 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 650 nits, suggesting excellent outdoor visibility. While the nova 8 Pro 5G’s display specs are not provided, Huawei typically employs high-quality OLED panels. The Realme GT 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) is standard for OLED technology, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. Without specific details on the nova 8 Pro 5G’s panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate), it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Realme GT 5G’s measured brightness gives it an edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or OIS, a direct comparison is challenging. Huawei typically excels in image processing, often prioritizing color accuracy and dynamic range. Realme, on the other hand, tends towards more vibrant, social media-friendly images. The absence of details on the nova 8 Pro 5G’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities against the Realme GT 5G. We can assume both offer a standard suite of camera modes, but the quality will depend heavily on the underlying hardware.
Performance
The performance gap is significant. The Realme GT 5G’s Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm) is built on a smaller fabrication process than the Huawei nova 8 Pro 5G’s Kirin 985 5G (7nm). This translates to greater transistor density, improved power efficiency, and ultimately, higher performance. The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core (2.84 GHz) is a substantial upgrade over the Kirin 985’s Cortex-A76 (2.58 GHz). While both utilize Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the Snapdragon 888’s A78 performance cores (2.42 GHz) outperform the Kirin 985’s A76 cores (2.40 GHz). This difference will be most noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. However, the Snapdragon 888 is known for thermal throttling under sustained load, a potential drawback.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 98 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds differ slightly. Both support 65W wired charging, achieving 100% charge in 35 minutes. The Huawei nova 8 Pro 5G adds 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. The Realme GT 5G’s larger power draw from the Snapdragon 888 may offset some of the battery life gains, but the fast charging mitigates this concern.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 8 Pro 5G if you need a phone with exceptionally fast charging, a sleek design, and a balanced user experience, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance. Buy the Realme GT 5G if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and the absolute fastest processing speeds, and are willing to manage potential thermal throttling.