Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Huawei nova 8 Pro 5G: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset delivers superior processing power, and while both phones offer excellent 65W+ charging, the Find X3 Pro’s endurance rating and brighter display provide a more refined overall experience. However, the nova 8 Pro remains a compelling option for those prioritizing Huawei’s ecosystem and a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei nova 8 Pro 5G | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 83, 84 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| EDGE | Yes | - |
| GPRS | Yes | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 23. Released 2021, January 08 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 74.1 x 7.9 mm (6.43 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1236 x 2676 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~439 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~91.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 120Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.84 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 985 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 (8-core) | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Single | 3.15 MP | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | VGA | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, White | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | BRQ-AN00, BRQ-AL00 | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.25 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei nova 8 Pro 5G
- Faster processor with Snapdragon 888
- Brighter and potentially higher refresh rate display
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging support
- Potentially higher price point
- Snapdragon 888 can generate more heat under sustained load
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Faster wired charging (66W)
- Sleek design and Huawei ecosystem integration
- Potentially more affordable price
- Less powerful Kirin 985 chipset
- Limited wireless charging options
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 774 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the nova 8 Pro. While both likely utilize OLED technology, the Find X3 Pro’s higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Find X3 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) is standard for OLED panels, ensuring deep blacks and vibrant colors. The absence of refresh rate data for the nova 8 Pro suggests it may not match the smoother experience potentially offered by a higher refresh rate panel on the Find X3 Pro, though this is speculative.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as having strong camera capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Oppo Find X3 Pro likely benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 888, enabling superior image processing and low-light performance. The absence of specific sensor details for both phones makes a direct comparison difficult, but Oppo’s history suggests a focus on high-quality sensors and computational photography. The nova 8 Pro’s camera system is likely optimized for Huawei’s aesthetic preferences, potentially resulting in different color profiles and image characteristics.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm) significantly outperforms the Huawei nova 8 Pro’s Kirin 985 5G (7nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core (2.84 GHz) provides a substantial performance boost over the Kirin 985’s Cortex-A76 (2.58 GHz). The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones feature 8GB of RAM (assumed based on market segment), the Snapdragon 888’s superior architecture will deliver a noticeably smoother and faster experience, particularly in graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive charging speeds. The Oppo Find X3 Pro supports 65W wired charging, achieving 40% charge in 10 minutes, while the Huawei nova 8 Pro’s 66W charging reaches 60% in 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes. The Find X3 Pro also adds 30W wireless charging (80 minutes to full) and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent or less powerful on the nova 8 Pro. Despite similar endurance ratings of 81 hours, the Snapdragon 888’s greater efficiency could translate to slightly longer real-world battery life for the Find X3 Pro, especially during demanding tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 8 Pro 5G if you prioritize a sleek design, fast 66W charging, and are deeply integrated into the Huawei ecosystem, potentially benefiting from seamless device interaction. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, value a brighter, more vibrant display, and appreciate the flexibility of the Snapdragon platform and wider app compatibility.