Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G vs Huawei nova 8 Pro 4G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) emerges as the stronger contender. The Snapdragon 870 provides a noticeable performance advantage, particularly in sustained workloads and gaming, and the 108-hour endurance rating suggests superior battery optimization despite similar charging speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei nova 8 Pro 4G | Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 26 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 18 | Available. Released 2021, September 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 74.1 x 7.9 mm (6.43 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1236 x 2676 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~439 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~91.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.58 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x2.40 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.84 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Kirin 985 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 (8-core) | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) 32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 5W reverse wired | 65W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, White | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey |
| Models | BRQ-AN00 | CPH2247 |
| Price | - | About 230 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 108h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 671577 (v9) GeekBench: 2941 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei nova 8 Pro 4G
- Sleek and modern design aesthetic
- Fast 66W wired charging
- Huawei ecosystem integration
- Kirin 985 chipset is outperformed by Snapdragon 870
- Potential software limitations due to geopolitical factors
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 processor
- Excellent 108-hour battery endurance
- More open software experience
- Design may be less striking than the nova 8 Pro
- Camera processing may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 780 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the unspecified brightness of the nova 8 Pro. While both offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), the Reno6 Pro’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor use. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate) are missing for both, but the Reno6 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised with capable camera systems, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the focus should be on image processing. Huawei historically emphasizes vibrant, sometimes oversaturated colors, while Oppo tends towards a more natural look. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it hard to assess low-light performance. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro lenses found on both, the primary sensor and image processing pipeline will be the deciding factors for photo and video quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) features a Kryo 585 CPU clocked up to 3.2 GHz, offering a significant performance uplift over the Huawei nova 8 Pro 4G’s Kirin 985 5G (7nm). The Snapdragon 870’s CPU architecture, with its higher clock speeds and more efficient core design, translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. While both are 7nm chips, the Snapdragon 870 consistently outperforms the Kirin 985 in benchmarks and real-world usage. The Reno6 Pro also benefits from potentially faster RAM speeds (LPDDR5x is common with this chipset) which further enhances responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G claims an impressive endurance rating of 108 hours, indicating excellent battery optimization. While the Huawei nova 8 Pro 4G’s battery capacity is not specified, the Reno6 Pro’s endurance suggests superior power management. Both devices support 65W wired charging, with the nova 8 Pro claiming 60% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes. The Reno6 Pro’s charging speed is comparable, but the longer overall endurance means users may find themselves charging less frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 8 Pro 4G if you prioritize a sleek design and are deeply embedded within the Huawei ecosystem, accepting the limitations of the Kirin chipset and potential software restrictions. Buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) if you value raw performance, longer battery life, and a more open software experience, making it ideal for gamers and power users.