Huawei nova 7 SE vs. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: Which 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the Huawei nova 7 SE is the better choice. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus provides comparable battery endurance and a solid all-around experience, making it ideal for those seeking a reliable and long-lasting 5G device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei nova 7 SE | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 23. Released 2020, April 28 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 75 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.34 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x2.22 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.84 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Kirin 820 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 (6-core) | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, Panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, 70% in 30 min 5W reverse wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Space Silver, Midsummer Purple, Crush Green | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | CDY-AN00, CDY-NX9B, CDY-TN00, CDY-AN20, CDL-AN50 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei nova 7 SE
- Faster 40W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- Potentially stronger CPU performance with the Kirin 820.
- 5W reverse wired charging for topping up accessories.
- Battery life is likely inferior to the Moto G 5G Plus.
- Camera specifications are unknown, creating uncertainty.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Excellent 114-hour battery endurance.
- Brighter display (543 nits) for better outdoor visibility.
- Balanced feature set for everyday use.
- Slower 20W charging.
- CPU performance may be slightly lower than the nova 7 SE.
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1269:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, which will provide a noticeably brighter and more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the nova 7 SE (brightness data unavailable). While both offer adequate viewing experiences, the Moto G 5G Plus has a clear advantage in outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or OIS, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests the nova 7 SE may prioritize camera features more heavily, given Huawei’s brand reputation. The absence of details on the Moto G 5G Plus’s camera system suggests a more standard implementation, likely focusing on versatility rather than exceptional low-light performance or image quality. We can assume both will offer acceptable results for social media sharing.
Performance
The Huawei nova 7 SE’s Kirin 820 5G (7nm) utilizes a tri-cluster CPU configuration with a high-performance Cortex-A76 core clocked at 2.36GHz, alongside two additional Cortex-A76 cores at 2.22GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency. This contrasts with the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus’s Snapdragon 765 5G (7nm) which employs a Kryo 475 Prime core at 2.3GHz, a Kryo 475 Gold core at 2.2GHz, and six Kryo 475 Silver cores. While clock speeds are similar, the Kirin 820’s architecture, with its multiple high-performance cores, suggests a potential edge in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. However, real-world performance will depend on software optimization and thermal management, which are not specified in the provided data.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus claims an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the nova 7 SE’s battery capacity is not specified, the Moto G 5G Plus’s endurance suggests a larger battery or more efficient power management. The nova 7 SE compensates with significantly faster 40W wired charging, capable of reaching 70% charge in just 30 minutes, compared to the Moto G 5G Plus’s slower 20W charging. This difference in charging speed is substantial, offering a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The nova 7 SE also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Moto G 5G Plus.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 7 SE if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications and appreciate significantly faster 40W charging. This phone is geared towards users who frequently game or edit videos on their mobile devices. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you prefer a phone with excellent battery life and a more balanced feature set, prioritizing longevity and consistent performance over peak power. It’s the better option for everyday users and media consumers.