Huawei nova 6 vs Oppo Find X2 Neo: Which 5G Mid-Ranger Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw processing power and potentially better long-term software support, the Huawei nova 6 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Kirin 990 chipset offers a performance edge, while the 40W charging is noticeably faster. However, the Oppo Find X2 Neo’s endurance rating and Qualcomm’s established 5G modem are significant advantages.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei nova 6 | Oppo Find X2 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 78 NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G 3.7/1.6 Gbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, April 15. Released 2020, May 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.6 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 159.4 x 72.4 x 7.7 mm (6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.09 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.86 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 10, no Google Play Services | Android 10, ColorOS 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Panorama, HDR, LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.2", 1.4µm 2 MP B/W, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@960fps, (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, 70% in 30 min | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4100 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4025 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red, Provence | Moonlight Black, Starry Blue |
| Models | WLZ-AL10, WLZ-TL10 | CPH2009 |
| Price | - | About 240 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 308231 (v8) GeekBench: 1815(v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei nova 6
- More powerful Kirin 990 chipset for demanding tasks
- Faster 40W wired charging
- Potentially superior camera image processing
- Software concerns with Huawei’s EMUI
- Battery life potentially shorter than the Find X2 Neo
Oppo Find X2 Neo
- Excellent 100-hour battery endurance
- Reliable Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G modem
- Cleaner Android experience with ColorOS
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Kirin 990
- Slower 30W wired charging
Display Comparison
Both the Huawei nova 6 and Oppo Find X2 Neo boast displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness and panel type (LCD vs OLED) are missing. Given the market positioning, it’s likely both utilize OLED panels. The Find X2 Neo’s endurance rating of 100h suggests a power-efficient display, potentially optimized for longer usage. Without specific nit ratings, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Find X2 Neo’s battery endurance hints at a well-tuned display.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are absent, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the focus should be on the main sensor and image processing. Huawei historically emphasizes computational photography, potentially giving the nova 6 an edge in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Snapdragon 765G’s ISP is also capable, but Huawei’s experience in camera technology is a significant factor. Without knowing sensor sizes and apertures, it’s difficult to assess the quality of other lenses (ultrawide, macro, etc.).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Huawei nova 6’s Kirin 990 (7nm) features a more complex CPU configuration – a combination of Cortex-A76 and A55 cores clocked at varying speeds, peaking at 2.86 GHz. This contrasts with the Oppo Find X2 Neo’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) which employs Kryo 475 cores. While the Snapdragon 765G is a capable performer, the Kirin 990 generally offers superior CPU and GPU performance, particularly in sustained workloads. This translates to smoother multitasking and a better gaming experience for the nova 6. The Snapdragon 765G’s integrated 5G modem is a key advantage, potentially offering more stable and widespread 5G connectivity.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X2 Neo’s 100-hour endurance rating is a standout feature, indicating excellent battery optimization. While the Huawei nova 6’s battery capacity is unknown, the Find X2 Neo’s rating suggests it will last longer on a single charge. However, the nova 6 compensates with significantly faster 40W wired charging, achieving 70% charge in just 30 minutes, compared to the Find X2 Neo’s 50% charge in 20 minutes. This faster charging mitigates the potential battery life difference for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 6 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if you’re comfortable with Huawei’s EMUI software. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery life, a reliable 5G connection, and a cleaner Android experience with ColorOS. The Find X2 Neo is also a better choice for users who value consistent performance over peak bursts.