Oppo Find X2 Pro vs Huawei nova 6 5G: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X2 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. While both phones boast excellent 5G connectivity and comparable battery endurance (88h rating), the Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a more consistently powerful and thermally stable experience, complemented by a brighter, higher-quality display.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei nova 6 5G | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December. Released 2019, December | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.09 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.86 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 10 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Panorama, HDR, LED flash | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 16mm (ultrawide) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@960fps, (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, 70% in 30 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red, Provence | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | WLZ-AN00, WLZ-TN00 | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | - | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei nova 6 5G
- Faster 40W charging to 70% in 30 minutes
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Huawei’s established 5G technology
- Kirin 990 chipset may throttle under sustained load
- Display likely inferior to Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Limited camera details available
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Snapdragon 865 offers superior performance and thermal management
- Brighter and higher-quality display (871 nits)
- 65W SuperVOOC charging for a full charge in 38 minutes
- Higher price point
- Potential software bloat (typical of Oppo)
- May lack some of Huawei’s specific 5G optimizations
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 871 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the nova 6 5G (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Find X2 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a more refined panel with deeper blacks. The lack of refresh rate data for the nova 6 5G means the Find X2 Pro likely offers a smoother visual experience, assuming a standard 120Hz panel.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the nova 6 5G. The Find X2 Pro likely benefits from a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms, typical of Oppo’s flagship offerings. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the nova 6 5G suggests the Find X2 Pro likely has a more robust stabilization system, crucial for low-light photography and video recording. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution auxiliary lenses on both devices, the core imaging experience likely favors the Find X2 Pro.
Performance
At the heart of the difference lies the chipset: the Oppo Find X2 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+), while the Huawei nova 6 5G features the Kirin 990 (7nm). The Snapdragon 865’s Cortex-A77 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, offers a slight architectural advantage over the Kirin 990’s 2.86 GHz Cortex-A76. More importantly, the 7nm+ fabrication process of the Snapdragon 865 generally results in better thermal efficiency, mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. Both utilize a similar memory configuration with Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, but the Snapdragon’s Adreno 650 GPU is expected to deliver superior graphics performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an impressive endurance rating of 88 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (data unavailable for nova 6 5G). However, the charging speeds are markedly different. The Oppo Find X2 Pro’s 65W SuperVOOC charging can fully charge the device in just 38 minutes, while the Huawei nova 6 5G takes 30 minutes to reach 70% charge. This means the Find X2 Pro offers a faster, more complete charging cycle, providing greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 6 5G if you prioritize rapid 40W charging and are comfortable with the Huawei ecosystem, potentially accepting some software limitations. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you demand top-tier performance from the Snapdragon 865, a superior display with 871 nits of brightness, and faster 65W SuperVOOC charging, even if it comes at a higher price point.