Huawei nova 13i vs. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its significantly faster 120W charging, coupled with the more powerful and efficient Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset, provides a smoother and more responsive experience. The Huawei nova 13i remains a viable option for budget-conscious users who prioritize a known chipset.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei nova 13i | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 14 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 74.7 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | EMUI 14.2, no Google Play Services | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, 3-62% in 30 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Blue | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | CTR-L91 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Huawei nova 13i
- More affordable price point
- Familiar Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Less powerful processor compared to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Likely lower display brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Powerful and efficient Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Higher price tag
- Mediatek chipset may not be preferred by all users
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Xiaomi)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1283 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Huawei nova 13i. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While panel technology isn't specified for either, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s brightness suggests a more advanced panel. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, but the Redmi's superior brightness is a clear advantage for media consumption and outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the nova 13i, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely features a more advanced camera system, benefiting from the processing power of the Dimensity 7200 Ultra. The Redmi's image processing capabilities will likely result in better dynamic range and low-light performance. While both phones may include standard features like portrait modes, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to deliver superior image quality overall.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Huawei nova 13i utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm), while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ features the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4nm). The Dimensity 7200 Ultra, with its Cortex-A715 cores clocked at 2.8 GHz, offers a substantial performance leap over the Snapdragon 680’s Cortex-A73 cores at 2.4 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7200 Ultra also provides superior power efficiency, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. This means the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ will handle demanding tasks and gaming more smoothly and for longer periods.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. In contrast, the Huawei nova 13i’s 40W charging takes 30 minutes to reach 62%. While the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s battery capacity isn't specified, the active use score of 10:38h suggests excellent battery life. The faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 13i if you need a reliable smartphone with a familiar Qualcomm Snapdragon processor and are on a tight budget, prioritizing cost savings over raw performance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prefer a faster, more responsive device with significantly quicker charging capabilities and a brighter, more vibrant display, and are willing to spend a bit more for these premium features.