The Huawei nova 12 and Oppo Find X7 represent distinct approaches to the smartphone market. The nova 12 aims to deliver a stylish experience with fast charging at a competitive price, while the Find X7 positions itself as a performance-focused device leveraging flagship-tier silicon. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Find X7 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 9300 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power over the Huawei nova 12’s Kirin 830. However, the nova 12 remains a compelling option for those seeking a balance of style and speed at a potentially lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5 , 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 26 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 05 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 75.4 x 7 mm (6.36 x 2.97 x 0.28 in) | 162.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm or 9.0 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1084 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.3 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, HDR, 120Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Kirin 830 (7 nm)* the chipset is not officially confirmed | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | - | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.0 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.4, 17mm, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC (320-960 kbps HD audio) | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired
5W reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown, Purple |
| Models | BLK-AL00 | PHZ110 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 520 EUR |
Huawei nova 12
- Fast 100W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price
- Stylish design
- Less powerful Kirin 830 chipset
- Potentially limited display technology
- Camera likely less advanced
Oppo Find X7
- Flagship-level Mediatek Dimensity 9300 performance
- Likely superior display quality (LTPO, brightness)
- Advanced camera system
- Higher price point
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
While specific display details for the nova 12 are currently limited, both devices are expected to feature OLED panels. The Oppo Find X7, being a flagship contender, likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, resulting in improved power efficiency. The Find X7’s display is likely to offer superior color accuracy and viewing angles. The nova 12 will likely focus on aesthetics and a vibrant display, but may not match the Find X7’s technical prowess.
Camera Comparison
Details on the camera systems are limited for both devices. However, the Oppo Find X7, positioned as a flagship, is expected to feature a more advanced camera setup with larger sensors and improved image processing. The Find X7 will likely prioritize image quality in low-light conditions and offer more versatile shooting modes. While the nova 12 will likely offer a capable camera for everyday use, it’s unlikely to match the Find X7’s capabilities in terms of dynamic range, detail, and overall image quality. We anticipate the Find X7 to have a more sophisticated OIS system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X7’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300, fabricated on a 4nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Huawei nova 12’s Kirin 830 (7nm). The Dimensity 9300’s CPU configuration – 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 – provides significantly more processing power and efficiency. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a superior gaming experience on the Find X7. The Kirin 830, while capable, will likely struggle with graphically intensive games at higher settings. Both phones utilize an octa-core CPU, but the architectural differences are critical.
Battery Life
Both devices support 100W wired charging, a significant advantage for quick top-ups. The Oppo Find X7 claims a 50% charge in 10 minutes and 100% in 26 minutes. While the nova 12 also supports 100W charging, the efficiency of the Dimensity 9300’s 4nm process in the Find X7 may result in slightly better overall battery life despite potentially similar battery capacities. The nova 12 also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature not explicitly mentioned for the Find X7.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 12 if you need a fashionable phone with very fast 100W charging and are comfortable with the potential limitations of the Kirin 830 chipset in demanding tasks. Buy the Oppo Find X7 if you prioritize top-tier performance for gaming, content creation, and multitasking, and are willing to invest in a device powered by the latest Mediatek Dimensity 9300 processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Kirin 830 chipset in the Huawei nova 12 sufficient for demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Kirin 830 is a capable chipset, it's likely to struggle with Genshin Impact at higher settings. Expect to lower graphics settings and potentially experience frame drops during intense gameplay. The Oppo Find X7’s Dimensity 9300 will provide a significantly smoother and more consistent gaming experience.
❓ How does the 100W charging on both phones compare in real-world usage?
Both phones offer incredibly fast charging speeds. The Oppo Find X7 claims a full charge in 26 minutes. While the nova 12 also supports 100W, the Dimensity 9300’s power efficiency might mean the Find X7 can maintain peak charging speeds for a longer duration, resulting in a slightly faster overall charge time.
❓ Does the Oppo Find X7 have any specific cooling features to manage the heat generated by the Dimensity 9300?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, flagship devices like the Oppo Find X7 typically incorporate advanced cooling systems, such as vapor chambers or graphite sheets, to dissipate heat effectively. This is crucial for maintaining sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming and video recording.
