Huawei nova 11 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter display, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the stronger choice. Its 10:28h active use score significantly surpasses what we'd expect from the nova 11, despite the latter's faster peak charging speed. However, the nova 11 remains a viable option for those heavily invested in the Huawei ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei nova 11 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 17 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 27 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 75 x 6.9 mm (6.35 x 2.95 x 0.27 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Kunlun Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1084 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.5 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 60 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, White, Gold | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | FOA-AL00, FOA-LX9 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Huawei nova 11
- Faster wired charging (31 minutes to 100%)
- Stylish design (Huawei aesthetic)
- Potentially strong GPU performance for gaming
- 4G connectivity only
- Likely shorter battery life
- Limited software updates (Huawei ecosystem)
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Longer battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- 5G connectivity
- Slower full charge time (vs nova 11)
- May have less refined camera processing
- Motorola’s software update track record is inconsistent
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the nova 11 (brightness data unavailable, but typically lower in this segment). While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the Edge 40 Neo’s brighter panel will consume more power, highlighting the trade-off between visual experience and battery life. We expect both to use OLED panels, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited, but we can infer some differences. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s marketing emphasizes its photo and video capabilities. Without sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, Motorola generally focuses on computational photography, potentially offering better image processing in challenging conditions. The nova 11’s camera performance will likely be solid, but may lean towards a more natural color profile. We’d advise ignoring any 2MP macro lenses on either device, as their image quality is typically subpar.
Performance
Both phones employ 6nm chipsets, but the architectures differ. The Huawei nova 11’s Snapdragon 778G 4G features a Kryo 670 CPU configuration (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz), while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 with a Cortex-A78 (2x2.5 GHz) and Cortex-A55 (6x2.0 GHz) setup. The Dimensity 7030’s Cortex-A78 cores offer a performance edge in single-core tasks, potentially benefiting app launch speeds and responsiveness. However, the Snapdragon 778G’s Adreno 642L GPU is a strong performer, and the 4G limitation will be a bottleneck for data-intensive tasks. The Edge 40 Neo’s 5G modem is a significant advantage for users in areas with 5G coverage.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use. This is a substantial advantage over what we’d anticipate from the nova 11, given its reliance on the less power-efficient Snapdragon 778G 4G and lack of detailed battery capacity information. While the nova 11 offers 66W wired charging, reaching 100% in 31 minutes, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging achieves 50% in just 15 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s superior battery life mitigates any charging speed disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 11 if you need a stylish device with a focus on fast charging and are comfortable with the limitations of a 4G-only modem. It’s a good fit for users who frequently transfer files via Wi-Fi and aren’t reliant on mobile data for demanding tasks. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize long-lasting battery life, a brighter and more visible display in sunlight, and 5G connectivity for seamless streaming and downloads.