Huawei nova 10 vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and wireless charging convenience, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is the better choice. Its 5G connectivity and wireless charging capabilities offer a more versatile experience, despite a slightly less powerful processor. However, users heavily reliant on consistently high 4G performance may find the nova 10’s Snapdragon 778G appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei nova 10 | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 04 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 10 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 73.9 x 6.9 mm (6.39 x 2.91 x 0.27 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10 | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 (China), EMUI 12 (Europe), no Google Play Services | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Green, Violet | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | NCO-AL00, NCO-LX1, NCO-LX3 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei nova 10
- Potentially faster CPU/GPU performance with Snapdragon 778G
- 66W fast wired charging for quick top-ups
- Sleek design (based on market perception of Huawei nova series)
- Lacks 5G connectivity, limiting future-proofing
- No wireless charging support
- Limited camera specification details
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- 68W wired and 5W wireless charging for versatility
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Slightly less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 778G
- Similar battery endurance despite different chipsets
- Camera specifications are equally limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors compared to the nova 10 (brightness data unavailable). Both displays feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, a common marketing term for OLED panels. While both likely utilize OLED technology, the Edge 30 Neo’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for users who frequently consume content in bright environments. The absence of refresh rate data for the nova 10 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Edge 30 Neo’s display is demonstrably brighter.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. The absence of specific details suggests both phones likely target a similar level of image quality, focusing on computational photography rather than hardware advantages. The lack of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is also a key omission. Users should rely on independent reviews for detailed camera performance analysis, as the provided data doesn’t offer a clear winner.
Performance
The Huawei nova 10 is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, featuring an octa-core CPU clocked up to 2.4 GHz. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo, however, utilizes the Snapdragon 695 5G, with a CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz and 6x1.7 GHz cores. While the 778G generally offers superior CPU and GPU performance, the Edge 30 Neo’s key advantage is its integrated 5G modem. The 6nm process node is shared by both chipsets, suggesting similar efficiency. The nova 10’s 4G limitation is a significant drawback for users in areas with 5G availability, while the 695’s slightly lower clock speeds may result in marginally slower performance in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both the Huawei nova 10 and Motorola Edge 30 Neo achieve an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, their charging capabilities differ significantly. The nova 10 supports 66W wired charging, while the Edge 30 Neo offers 68W wired charging *and* 5W wireless charging. The Edge 30 Neo’s wireless charging is a significant convenience feature, allowing for cable-free top-ups. While the wired charging speeds are similar, the addition of wireless charging gives the Edge 30 Neo a clear advantage for users who value flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 10 if you need consistently strong 4G performance for streaming or gaming in areas with limited 5G coverage, and if you prioritize the fastest possible wired charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer the flexibility of 5G connectivity, the convenience of wireless charging, and a slightly brighter display, even if it means a minor performance trade-off.