Huawei nova 10 SE vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and battery life, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger contender. Its MediaTek Dimensity 7030 chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift over the Snapdragon 680G in the nova 10 SE, and its impressive 10:28h active use battery score provides significantly longer runtimes.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei nova 10 SE | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - BNE-LX1 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - BNE-LX1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - BNE-LX3 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 05 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 25 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 75.5 x 7.4 mm (6.39 x 2.97 x 0.29 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Always-On Display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680G 4G (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | EMUI 12, no Google Play Services | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (BNE-LX1 only) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasound) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Starry Silver, Mint Green, Starry Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | BNE-LX1, BNE-LX3, BNE-AL00 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Huawei nova 10 SE
- Fast 66W wired charging
- Familiar Huawei design aesthetic
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 680G chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
- Display likely lacks the brightness of the Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter and more vibrant display (1073 nits)
- Potentially higher price point
- Motorola’s software experience may not appeal to all users
- Camera performance relies heavily on software processing
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for smartphone users. While the nova 10 SE’s display specifications are not provided, it’s unlikely to match the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits from a higher contrast ratio and potentially wider color gamut, enhancing the viewing experience for multimedia content. The lack of information on the nova 10 SE’s panel technology makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Edge 40 Neo clearly holds an advantage in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for both devices, a precise comparison is challenging. However, the focus should be on the main sensor and image processing capabilities. The Edge 40 Neo likely benefits from MediaTek’s Imagiq image signal processor, which offers advanced features like HDR processing and noise reduction. The nova 10 SE’s camera performance will depend heavily on Huawei’s software optimizations. It’s important to note that the inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical value due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, represents a significant step up in CPU performance compared to the Huawei nova 10 SE’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680G. The Dimensity 7030’s Cortex-A78 cores are architecturally superior to the Cortex-A73 cores found in the Snapdragon 680G, resulting in faster single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. While both chips are fabricated on a 6nm process, the Dimensity 7030’s more modern architecture provides a clear advantage. The Snapdragon 680G is adequate for basic tasks, but the Dimensity 7030 is better suited for demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery department, achieving an impressive 10:28h active use score and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This indicates significantly longer battery life compared to what we’d expect from the nova 10 SE, given its unspecified battery capacity. Both phones support 68W wired charging, with the Edge 40 Neo claiming a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. While the nova 10 SE also offers 66W charging, the Edge 40 Neo’s larger battery capacity and optimized power efficiency mean it can sustain usage for a longer period, even with similar charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei nova 10 SE if you prioritize a familiar Huawei aesthetic and fast 66W charging, and your usage is primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media and light browsing. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value a more powerful processor for gaming and multitasking, longer battery life, and a brighter, more vibrant display. The Edge 40 Neo is the better choice for power users and those who demand more from their smartphone.