The Android tablet market is heating up, with Huawei and Oppo both offering compelling options. The Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) aims for a premium, productivity-focused experience with its large display and powerful chipset. The Oppo Pad 3, meanwhile, targets a broader audience with a focus on streamlined performance and value. This comparison dives deep into the key differences to help you choose the right tablet for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) is the superior choice. While the Oppo Pad 3 offers a competitive chipset, the MatePad Pro’s Kirin T92A and faster charging provide a more robust experience, especially for demanding tasks. However, the Pad 3 represents a strong value proposition.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | N/A |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 15 | 2024, November 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 15 | Available. Released 2024, November 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 271.3 x 182.5 x 5.5 mm (10.68 x 7.19 x 0.22 in) | 257.8 x 189.1 x 6.3 mm (10.15 x 7.44 x 0.25 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 508 g (1.12 lb) | 533 g or 536 g (1.18 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2800 x 1840 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~275 ppi density) | 2000 x 2800 pixels (~296 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.2 inches, 440.7 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.61 inches, 411.3 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Double-layer OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2000 nits (peak), HDR Vivid | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, 500 nits (typ), 700 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz & 3x2.00 GHz & 4x1.6GHz) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Kirin T92A (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Maleoon 920 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.3 | Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 8 MP |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 85% in 40 min, 100% in 55 min
7.5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, QC, UFCS |
| Type | Li-Po 10100 mAh | 9520 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Silver, Blue, Purple |
| Models | MRDI-W09 | OPD2405 |
| Price | About 850 EUR | About 280 EUR |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)
- Brighter, larger display for immersive viewing.
- Faster 100W charging for minimal downtime.
- Potentially stronger single-core CPU performance.
- 7nm process may lead to higher temperatures under sustained load.
- Larger size may be less portable.
Oppo Pad 3
- More efficient 4nm chipset for potentially longer battery life.
- Competitive performance for everyday tasks.
- Likely more affordable price point.
- Slower charging speed compared to Huawei.
- Display likely less bright and vibrant.
Display Comparison
The Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1045 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility and HDR content. While Oppo doesn't provide nits data, the MatePad Pro’s brightness advantage is substantial. Both tablets likely utilize IPS LCD panels, but the larger screen real estate of the MatePad Pro enhances immersive viewing. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving, a common feature in higher-end tablets.
Camera Comparison
Neither tablet is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and detailed camera specs are unavailable. Given the context, camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor. Both will likely feature adequate cameras for video calls and casual snapshots, but users seeking high-quality mobile photography should look elsewhere.
Performance
The chipset battle pits Huawei’s Kirin T92A (7nm) against Oppo’s MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (4nm). The Dimensity 8350, built on a more efficient 4nm process, theoretically offers better power efficiency. However, the Kirin T92A’s octa-core configuration, with a higher peak clock speed of 2.4 GHz, suggests stronger single-core performance. The Dimensity 8350’s Cortex-A715 cores are powerful, but the MatePad Pro’s CPU architecture may provide an edge in tasks optimized for single-threaded performance. Thermal management will be key; the 7nm Kirin T92A may run hotter under sustained load, but Huawei’s cooling solutions could mitigate this.
Battery Life
The Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) achieves an impressive 11:24 hours of active use, demonstrating excellent battery life. While the Oppo Pad 3’s battery capacity is unknown, the MatePad Pro’s endurance is a significant advantage. Huawei’s 100W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving 85% charge in just 40 minutes and a full charge in 55 minutes. Oppo’s 67W charging, while still fast, is slower. The MatePad Pro also offers 7.5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) if you need a large, bright display for creative work, multitasking, or media consumption, and require consistently high performance for demanding applications. Buy the Oppo Pad 3 if you prefer a more portable and affordable tablet for everyday tasks, streaming, and light gaming, and value a balance between performance and price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Kirin T92A chipset in the Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025) throttle under heavy gaming loads?
While the 7nm process isn't as efficient as the 4nm Dimensity 8350, Huawei likely employs thermal management solutions to mitigate throttling. However, prolonged, demanding gaming sessions may still result in some performance reduction. Real-world testing is needed to determine the extent of throttling.
❓ How does the charging speed of the Oppo Pad 3 compare to other tablets in its price range?
Oppo’s 67W charging is relatively fast and competitive within the mid-range tablet segment. While not as rapid as the Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2’s 100W charging, it’s still significantly faster than many other tablets in the same price bracket, offering a convenient charging experience.
❓ Is the lack of an adaptive refresh rate (LTPO) on either tablet a significant drawback?
The absence of LTPO technology means neither tablet can dynamically adjust its refresh rate to conserve battery life. This isn't a dealbreaker for all users, but those prioritizing maximum battery efficiency may notice a difference compared to tablets with LTPO displays.
