The Android tablet market is heating up, and two contenders are vying for your attention: the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022) and the Xiaomi Pad 5. Both offer premium features and impressive performance, but which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022) generally edges out the Xiaomi Pad 5 thanks to its brighter display, more powerful chipset (depending on variant), and faster charging. However, the Xiaomi Pad 5 remains a compelling option, especially for those seeking excellent value and a vibrant display at a more accessible price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | LTE | - |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 27 | 2021, August 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 10 | Available. Released 2021, August 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 249.2 x 160.4 x 5.9 mm (9.81 x 6.31 x 0.23 in) | 254.7 x 166.3 x 6.9 mm (10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) | No |
| Weight | 449 g (455 g cellular model) (15.84 oz) | 511 g (1.13 lb) |
| | Stylus support | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2560 x 1600 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~87.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) - GOT-W29Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) - GOT-W09, GOT-AL09, GOT-AL19 | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) - GOT-W29Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 (5 nm) - GOT-W09, GOT-AL09, GOT-AL19 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 - GOT-W29Adreno 660 - GOT-W09, GOT-AL09, GOT-AL19 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 13 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, (5.1 for GOT-W29), A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS - cellular model only | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, tri-band (dual-band for GOT-W29), Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired (GOT-W09, GOT-AL09, GOT-AL19)
40W wired (GOT-W29)
Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 8300 mAh | Li-Po 8720 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Golden Black, Galaxy Blue, Crystal White, Brocade White | Cosmic Gray, Pearl White, Green |
| Models | GOT-W09, GOT-W29, GOT-AL09, GOT-AL19 | 21051182G, 21051182C |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1271:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-23.5 LUFS (Very good)
|
-24.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 780161 (v9)
GeekBench: 3685 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 473819 (v8), 555079 (v9)
GeekBench: 2583 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 24fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022)
- Brighter Display
- Potentially More Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 888 variant)
- Faster Charging (66W)
- Premium Build Quality
- Good Audio Quality
- Potentially Higher Price
- Huawei Ecosystem Limitations (no Google Play Services)
- Charging speed varies by variant (40W on some models)
Xiaomi Pad 5
- Excellent Value for Money
- Vibrant Display
- Solid Performance (Snapdragon 860)
- Good Battery Life
- PD3.0 Charging
- Less Bright Display
- Slightly Slower Performance than MatePad Pro (888 variant)
- Slower Charging (33W)
Display Comparison
The Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 591 nits compared to the Xiaomi Pad 5's 478 nits. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (effectively infinite for Huawei and 1271:1 for Xiaomi), the Huawei's higher brightness makes it more comfortable to use outdoors or in brightly lit environments. Both tablets feature 120Hz refresh rates for smooth scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is generally not a primary concern for tablets, but the MatePad Pro 11 (2022) typically offers slightly better image quality thanks to its more advanced camera hardware. Both tablets feature decent front-facing cameras suitable for video calls. Detailed camera specs are often difficult to find for both devices, so real-world testing is recommended.
Performance
Performance is a bit nuanced. The MatePad Pro 11 (2022) comes in two variants: one with the Snapdragon 870 and another with the Snapdragon 888. Both are powerful, but the 888 variant offers a noticeable performance boost. The Xiaomi Pad 5 utilizes the Snapdragon 860, which is still a capable chip but slightly less powerful than either of the MatePad Pro's options. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading on the MatePad Pro, particularly the 888 variant.
Battery Life
The Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022) supports 66W wired charging (on some variants), significantly faster than the Xiaomi Pad 5's 33W charging. Both tablets offer respectable battery life for typical tablet usage, but the faster charging on the Huawei allows for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022)? Users prioritizing a top-tier display, raw performance for demanding tasks, and faster charging will appreciate the MatePad Pro. Who should buy the Xiaomi Pad 5? Those on a tighter budget who still want a premium Android tablet experience with a great display and solid performance will find the Xiaomi Pad 5 an excellent choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022) have Google Play Services?
No, the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022) does not have Google Play Services. It uses Huawei's AppGallery and Huawei Mobile Services instead. Users will need to find alternative app sources.
❓ Which tablet is better for gaming?
The Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022) with the Snapdragon 888 variant generally offers better gaming performance due to its more powerful chipset. However, the Xiaomi Pad 5 is still capable of handling most games smoothly.
