The Android tablet market is heating up, with options ranging from budget-friendly to premium. The Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022), available with either a Snapdragon 870 or 888, aims for a high-performance experience, while the Oppo Pad Air2 focuses on delivering a sleek, portable design with a more efficient processor. This comparison dives deep into the key differences to help you determine which tablet best suits your workflow and entertainment needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (especially the Snapdragon 888 variant) is the clear winner. However, the Oppo Pad Air2 offers a compelling balance of portability and efficiency, making it ideal for everyday tasks and media consumption on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | LTE | N/A |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 27 | 2023, November 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 10 | Available. Released 2023, November 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 249.2 x 160.4 x 5.9 mm (9.81 x 6.31 x 0.23 in) | 255.1 x 188 x 6.9 mm (10.04 x 7.40 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) | No |
| Weight | 449 g (455 g cellular model) (15.84 oz) | 538 g (1.19 lb) |
| | Stylus support | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2560 x 1600 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 1720 x 2408 pixels (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~87.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.4 inches, 396.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 600 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) - GOT-W29Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) - GOT-W09, GOT-AL09, GOT-AL19 | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) - GOT-W29Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 (5 nm) - GOT-W09, GOT-AL09, GOT-AL19 | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 - GOT-W29Adreno 660 - GOT-W09, GOT-AL09, GOT-AL19 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 13, ColorOS 13.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, (5.1 for GOT-W29), A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS - cellular model only | GPS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, tri-band (dual-band for GOT-W29), Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired (GOT-W09, GOT-AL09, GOT-AL19)
40W wired (GOT-W29)
Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Po 8300 mAh | Li-Po 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Golden Black, Galaxy Blue, Crystal White, Brocade White | Silver, Gray |
| Models | GOT-W09, GOT-W29, GOT-AL09, GOT-AL19 | - |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-23.5 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 780161 (v9)
GeekBench: 3685 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022)
- Significantly more powerful processor options (Snapdragon 870/888)
- Faster 66W charging (on select models)
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price
- Larger and heavier than the Oppo Pad Air2
Oppo Pad Air2
- More affordable price point
- Lightweight and portable design
- Efficient MediaTek Helio G99 processor
- Lower performance compared to Snapdragon 870/888
- Slower 33W charging
Display Comparison
The Huawei MatePad Pro 11 boasts a bright display, reaching a measured 591 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in outdoor conditions. While the Oppo Pad Air2’s display specifications aren’t provided, its ‘Air’ branding suggests a focus on thinness and potentially a slightly less vibrant panel. Both tablets likely feature IPS LCDs, but the MatePad Pro 11’s higher brightness gives it an edge for HDR content and outdoor use. The infinite contrast ratio (nominal) on the Huawei suggests a well-tuned panel, though real-world performance will depend on backlight uniformity. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rates are likely fixed, impacting battery life during dynamic content.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance isn’t a primary focus for tablets, but the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 likely has an advantage due to its more powerful ISP within the Snapdragon chipset. Without specific camera specs for either device, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, the MatePad Pro 11’s processing power allows for more sophisticated image processing, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Oppo Pad Air2’s Helio G99 will likely deliver adequate results for casual snapshots, but won’t compete with the Huawei in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The performance gap between these tablets is substantial. The Huawei MatePad Pro 11 offers two chipset options: the Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) and the Snapdragon 888 (5nm). The Snapdragon 888, with its Cortex-X1 prime core, provides a significant performance uplift over the MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm) found in the Oppo Pad Air2. The 888’s 5nm process also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Helio G99, while efficient, is geared towards mid-range performance, suitable for everyday tasks but struggling with graphically intensive games or demanding applications. The MatePad Pro 11’s LPDDR5 RAM (spec not provided for Oppo) further enhances its multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Oppo Pad Air2’s 33W wired charging with PD is respectable, offering a reasonable charging speed for its likely battery capacity (spec not provided). However, the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 significantly raises the bar with 66W wired charging (on Snapdragon 888/870 models), drastically reducing charge times. While the MatePad Pro 11’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging is a major convenience factor. The Helio G99’s 6nm process in the Oppo Pad Air2 should contribute to good battery life for typical usage, but the Snapdragon 888 in the MatePad Pro 11’s efficiency gains from the 5nm node could offset the higher power draw during demanding tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 (2022) if you need a tablet capable of handling demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, or multitasking with numerous apps. Its powerful Snapdragon processor and faster charging are significant advantages. Buy the Oppo Pad Air2 if you prefer a lightweight, highly portable tablet for reading, browsing, and streaming content, and value battery efficiency over peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 888 in the Huawei MatePad Pro 11 get noticeably hotter than the Helio G99 in the Oppo Pad Air2 during extended gaming sessions?
Yes, the Snapdragon 888 is a more powerful chip and will generate more heat under sustained load. However, the 5nm process and Huawei’s thermal management system should mitigate throttling better than the Oppo Pad Air2’s Helio G99, allowing for longer periods of peak performance before thermal limitations kick in.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 33W (Oppo) and 66W (Huawei) truly noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. While 33W is adequate, 66W can significantly reduce charging times. You can expect to go from near-empty to a substantial charge (e.g., 50%) in under 30 minutes with the Huawei, whereas the Oppo Pad Air2 will take considerably longer. This is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their tablet quickly.
❓ Given the lack of Google Mobile Services on the Huawei MatePad Pro 11, how does app availability compare to the Oppo Pad Air2?
The Oppo Pad Air2 benefits from full Google Mobile Services (GMS) support, providing seamless access to the Google Play Store and all its apps. The Huawei MatePad Pro 11 relies on Huawei Mobile Services (HMS) and the AppGallery. While the AppGallery is growing, it still lacks some popular apps. Users can sideload apps, but this requires technical knowledge and may not be ideal for all users.
