The high-end Android tablet space is heating up. Huawei's MatePad 12 X (2025) prioritizes exceptional battery endurance, while Samsung's Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra aims for uncompromising performance. This comparison dissects the key differences between these two flagship devices, helping you determine which aligns best with your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025) emerges as the winner. Its 94-hour battery endurance significantly outpaces the Tab S10 Ultra’s 85:18h, making it ideal for travel or extended use. However, power users demanding the absolute fastest processing speeds will favor the Samsung.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 19 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 19 | Available. Released 2024, October 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 270 x 183 x 5.9 mm (10.63 x 7.20 x 0.23 in) | 326.4 x 208.6 x 5.4 mm (12.85 x 8.21 x 0.21 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + eSIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 555 g (1.22 lb) | 718 g (Wi-Fi), 723 g (5G) (1.58 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 2800 x 1840 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~279 ppi density) | 1848 x 2960 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~239 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.0 inches, 426.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 14.6 inches, 617.8 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 1000 nits (peak), HDR Vivid | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Kirin T92B | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | - | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.3 | Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, AF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide)
12 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic accessory connector | USB Type-C 3.2, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 45W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 10100 mAh | Li-Po 11200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Greenery | Moonstone Gray, Platinum Silver |
| Models | LRT-W09 | SM-X920, SM-X926B, SM-X926N, SM-X920N |
| Price | About 690 EUR | $ 899.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 94:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | 85:18h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | Class G | Class G |
| Free fall | Class E (0 falls) | Class E (0 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025)
- Exceptional 94-hour battery life
- Long-term battery health with 1000 charge cycles
- Potentially more efficient power management
- Less powerful chipset compared to the competition
- Limited performance headroom for demanding tasks
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- Faster 45W wired charging
- Superior processing capabilities for gaming and content creation
- Shorter 85:18h battery life
- Potentially higher thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing, both tablets are expected to feature high-resolution panels. However, the core difference lies beneath the surface. The Samsung Tab S10 Ultra, leveraging the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+’s processing power, likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing for enhanced color accuracy and dynamic range. The Huawei MatePad 12 X, while potentially lacking the same peak performance, may compensate with optimized power efficiency in its display driver, contributing to its overall battery life.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but given the market positioning, both tablets will likely feature multi-camera systems. However, the processing capabilities of the Dimensity 9300+ in the Tab S10 Ultra suggest superior image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better low-light performance and more detailed photos. The MatePad 12 X will likely rely on software optimization to compensate for any hardware limitations.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) chipset is the clear performance leader. Its octa-core configuration, specifically the 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores, delivers significantly more processing power than the Huawei MatePad 12 X’s Kirin T92B. The 4nm fabrication process of the Dimensity chip also translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially allowing for sustained peak performance during intensive tasks. While the MatePad 12 X’s Kirin T92B is an octa-core processor, it lacks the detailed core breakdown and advanced architecture of the Dimensity, suggesting a focus on efficiency rather than outright speed.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025) truly shines. Its 94:00h endurance is a substantial improvement over the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra’s 85:18h. This difference is likely due to a combination of factors, including the more efficient Kirin T92B chipset and optimized power management. Furthermore, the MatePad 12 X boasts 1000 battery charge cycles, indicating a longer lifespan compared to the Tab S10 Ultra’s 2000 cycles – a potentially misleading metric as cycle count doesn’t directly correlate to longevity, but rather the number of full charge/discharge cycles before noticeable degradation. The Tab S10 Ultra compensates with 45W wired charging, faster than the MatePad 12 X’s 66W, potentially reducing downtime despite the shorter overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025) if you need a tablet that can reliably last through multiple days of moderate use, value long-term battery health with its 1000 charge cycles, and prefer a balanced experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks like video editing or high-end gaming, and appreciate the benefits of the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ chipset’s architecture.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ in the Tab S10 Ultra exhibit thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9300+ is a powerful chipset, its sustained performance will depend on Samsung’s thermal management solution. The 4nm process helps, but demanding games could still lead to throttling, reducing clock speeds to prevent overheating. The MatePad 12 X, with its less powerful chipset, is less likely to experience significant throttling.
❓ How does the 1000 charge cycle rating of the MatePad 12 X compare to the 2000 cycle rating of the Tab S10 Ultra in terms of long-term battery health?
While 2000 cycles *sounds* better, it's a potentially misleading metric. Cycle count represents the number of full charge/discharge cycles before noticeable degradation. The MatePad 12 X’s 1000 cycles, combined with its efficient chipset and power management, may result in comparable or even superior long-term battery health despite the lower cycle count. Battery degradation is influenced by many factors beyond just cycle count.
❓ Is the 66W charging on the MatePad 12 X fast enough to offset its shorter battery endurance compared to the Tab S10 Ultra?
No, the 66W charging, while respectable, doesn't fully compensate for the Tab S10 Ultra’s faster 45W charging and the MatePad’s lower overall endurance. The Tab S10 Ultra will still reach a full charge faster, but the MatePad 12 X will simply require charging less frequently due to its longer battery life.
