The Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025) and the Honor Pad V8 Pro represent compelling options in the premium Android tablet space. While both target users seeking a large-screen experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware choices, particularly in chipset and battery endurance. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term reliability and sustained performance, the Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025) emerges as the winner. Its 94-hour battery endurance and 1000 charge cycles offer a significant advantage over the Honor Pad V8 Pro, despite the latter’s more powerful, but potentially thermally constrained, Dimensity 8100.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | N/A |
| EDGE | No | N/A |
| GPRS | No | N/A |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 19 | 2022, December 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 19 | Available. Released 2022, December 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 270 x 183 x 5.9 mm (10.63 x 7.20 x 0.23 in) | 277 x 179 x 6.6 mm or 7 mm |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 555 g (1.22 lb) | 589 g or 599 g (1.30 lb) |
| | - | Honor Pencil 3 (15ms latency) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 2800 x 1840 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~279 ppi density) | 2560 x 1600 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~249 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.0 inches, 426.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.1 inches, 424.5 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 1000 nits (peak), HDR Vivid | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, 600 nits |
| | - | IMAX enhanced |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin T92B | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.3 | Android 12, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (8 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic accessory connector | USB Type-C, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired | 35W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 10100 mAh | Li-Po 10050 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Greenery | Grey, Blue, Orange |
| Models | LRT-W09 | ROD-W09 |
| Price | About 690 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 94:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class E (0 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025)
- Exceptional 94-hour battery life
- 1000 charge cycle longevity
- Faster 66W wired charging
- Potentially more consistent performance due to efficient chipset
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Dimensity 8100
- Limited performance headroom for demanding tasks
Honor Pad V8 Pro
- Powerful MediaTek Dimensity 8100 chipset
- Faster CPU cores for demanding applications
- Potentially smoother graphics rendering
- Likely better suited for gaming
- Shorter battery life compared to the MatePad 12 X
- Slower 35W charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
While display specifications are absent in the provided data, both tablets likely feature high-resolution LCD or OLED panels given their positioning. However, the chipset differences suggest potential variations in display processing capabilities. The Dimensity 8100 in the Honor Pad V8 Pro boasts a more powerful GPU, potentially enabling smoother rendering of high-resolution content and higher refresh rates if supported by the panel. Huawei’s Kirin T92B, while less powerful on paper, may benefit from software optimizations to deliver a visually pleasing experience.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn't offer any camera details. Given the tablet form factor, camera quality is typically secondary to other features. However, we can speculate that the Honor Pad V8 Pro, being positioned as a more performance-focused device, might incorporate a slightly more advanced camera system. Huawei, with its history in smartphone photography, could potentially leverage its image processing expertise in the MatePad 12 X, even with similar hardware.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Pad V8 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (5nm) is a proven performer, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture provides a significant performance boost over the Huawei MatePad 12 X’s Kirin T92B. However, the 5nm process, while efficient, can generate more heat under sustained load, potentially leading to thermal throttling. The Kirin T92B, while lacking specific core details, likely prioritizes efficiency, potentially offering more consistent performance over extended periods. The absence of RAM specifications makes a direct comparison difficult, but both tablets will likely utilize LPDDR5 or LPDDR5x RAM for fast memory access.
Battery Life
This is where the MatePad 12 X (2025) truly shines. Its claimed 94-hour endurance is a substantial advantage over what we’d expect from the Honor Pad V8 Pro, given the Dimensity 8100’s power consumption. The 1000 charge cycle rating further reinforces the MatePad 12 X’s longevity. While the Honor Pad V8 Pro offers 35W wired charging, the MatePad 12 X’s 66W charging will significantly reduce 0-100% charging times. The faster charging speed, combined with the longer endurance, makes the MatePad 12 X the clear winner for users who value battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei MatePad 12 X (2025) if you need a tablet that can reliably last through extended travel, long workdays, or frequent media consumption without constantly seeking a power outlet. Its focus on battery longevity and consistent performance makes it ideal for professionals and power users. Buy the Honor Pad V8 Pro if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life and the need for more frequent charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8100 in the Honor Pad V8 Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8100 is a powerful chip, but its 5nm process can generate significant heat under sustained load. While Honor likely implements thermal management solutions, prolonged gaming at maximum settings could lead to thermal throttling, reducing performance to prevent overheating. The MatePad 12 X’s Kirin T92B, prioritizing efficiency, is less prone to this issue.
❓ How does the 66W charging on the MatePad 12 X compare to the 35W charging on the Pad V8 Pro in real-world usage?
The 66W charging on the MatePad 12 X will significantly reduce charging times. Expect a much faster 0-100% charge compared to the 35W charging on the Honor Pad V8 Pro. This is particularly beneficial for users who need to quickly top up their tablet before a commute or meeting.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and video streaming?
For typical tasks like web browsing, video streaming, and social media, the difference in chipset performance between the Kirin T92B and the Dimensity 8100 will likely be minimal. Both tablets will provide a smooth and responsive experience. The performance gap becomes more apparent in demanding applications like video editing or graphically intensive games.
