Huawei Mate Xs vs. Motorola Razr+ 2025: A Detailed Foldable Phone Comparison

The foldable phone market is evolving rapidly. We pit the Huawei Mate Xs, representing an earlier generation of outward-folding designs, against the Motorola Razr+ 2025, a newer clamshell foldable aiming for mainstream appeal. This comparison focuses on how advancements in chipset technology and battery optimization impact the user experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 is the superior choice. Its modern Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset delivers significantly better performance and efficiency, while the active use battery score of 10:12h surpasses the Mate Xs’ endurance rating of 69h. The Razr+ offers a more refined and future-proof foldable experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Huawei Mate Xs Motorola Razr+ 2025
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71
5G bands1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat21 1400/200 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL)HSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 052025, April 24
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2025, June 03
Body
BuildPlastic front, aluminum back, aluminum framePlastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium)
DimensionsUnfolded: 161.3 x 146.2 x 5.4 mmFolded: 161.3 x 78.5 x 11 mmUnfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + eSIM
Weight300 g (10.58 oz)189 g (6.67 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass-
Resolution2200 x 2480 pixels (~414 ppi density)1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density)
Size8.0 inches, 205.0 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeFoldable OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)
 Folded cover display: AMOLED, 6.6 inches, 1148 x 2480 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio-
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetKirin 990 5G (7 nm+)Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUMali-G76 MP16Adreno 735
OSAndroid 10, EMUI 10, no Google Play ServicesAndroid 15
Memory
Card slotNano Memory (uses shared SIM slot)No
Internal512GB 8GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 2.1-
Main Camera
Dual-50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
FeaturesLeica optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single5 MP, AF 5 MP, AF-
Triple40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 81mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), AF TOF 3D, (depth)-
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
SingleYes32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
Video1080p@30fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps
 No - uses main camera-
Sound
3.5mm jack No-
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos)
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless
Infrared portYes-
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band
Features
BrowserHTML, Adobe Flash-
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging55W wired, 85% in 30 min45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired
Stand-byUp to 312 h-
Talk timeUp to 6 h-
TypeLi-Po 4500 mAh4000 mAh
Misc
ColorsInterstellar BluePantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink
ModelsTAH-N29mXT2451-1
PriceAbout 1950 EUR$ 500.00
SAR0.29 W/kg (head)     0.54 W/kg (body)     -
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 69h -
Camera Photo / Video-
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)-
Loudspeaker -27.0 LUFS (Good) -
Performance AnTuTu: 459274 (v8), 461406 (unfolded) GeekBench: 12213 (v4.4), 2980 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen unfolded)-

Huawei Mate Xs

  • Larger, uninterrupted foldable display
  • Potentially lower price point (due to age)
  • Fast 55W wired charging

  • Older Kirin 990 chipset
  • Lower display brightness
  • Limited software support

Motorola Razr+ 2025

  • Modern Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
  • Improved battery life (10:12h active use)
  • Compact clamshell design

  • Smaller internal display
  • Slower charging than Mate Xs (45W)
  • Potentially higher price

Display Comparison

The Huawei Mate Xs boasts a single, expansive foldable display, while the Razr+ 2025 utilizes a clamshell design with both an internal and external display. The Mate Xs’ measured peak brightness of 413 nits is noticeably lower than what we expect from modern flagships, potentially impacting outdoor visibility. While the Mate Xs claims an infinite contrast ratio, this is a nominal value common to OLED panels. The Razr+ 2025, while lacking specific brightness data, likely benefits from newer panel technology and improved calibration. The Razr+'s smaller cover display offers quick access to notifications and widgets, a feature absent on the Mate Xs.

Camera Comparison

Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited for the Mate Xs. The Razr+ 2025’s camera system is expected to benefit from Qualcomm’s latest image signal processor (ISP), offering improved noise reduction and dynamic range. Without sensor size or aperture information for the Mate Xs, it’s difficult to assess its image quality relative to the Razr+. The Razr+ likely incorporates advanced computational photography features, leveraging the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s processing power for superior image enhancement.

Performance

The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) represents a substantial leap in performance and efficiency over the Huawei Mate Xs’ Kirin 990 5G (7nm+). The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside Cortex-A720 and A520 cores, offering superior single-core and multi-core performance. The 4nm process node translates to lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling during demanding tasks. The Kirin 990, while capable, is showing its age, and its older architecture will struggle to match the Razr+ in gaming and sustained workloads.

Battery Life

The Huawei Mate Xs’ endurance rating of 69 hours, while impressive, is a broad metric. The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s active use score of 10:12h provides a more realistic indication of real-world battery performance. The Razr+ offers 45W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and 5W reverse wired charging, providing versatile charging options. The Mate Xs supports 55W wired charging, achieving 85% charge in 30 minutes, but lacks wireless charging. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s improved power efficiency likely contributes to the Razr+’s longer battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity.

Buying Guide

Buy the Huawei Mate Xs if you prioritize a larger, uninterrupted display and are comfortable with an older chipset and potentially limited software support. It's a good option for those seeking a unique form factor at a potentially lower price point. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you value performance, battery life, and a more compact, pocketable design. It’s ideal for users who want a modern foldable experience with the latest features and software updates.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Kirin 990 in the Mate Xs struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Kirin 990, while capable, will likely exhibit noticeable frame drops and thermal throttling in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Razr+ 2025 is significantly better equipped to handle such titles at higher settings and for extended periods.
❓ How does the outward-folding design of the Mate Xs impact its durability compared to the Razr+'s clamshell form factor?
Outward-folding designs like the Mate Xs are generally considered more susceptible to screen damage as the display is exposed when folded. The Razr+'s clamshell design offers greater protection for the internal display when closed, enhancing its overall durability.
❓ Is the 15W wireless charging on the Razr+ 2025 significantly slower than the Mate Xs' 55W wired charging?
Yes, 15W wireless charging is considerably slower than 55W wired charging. However, the Razr+'s 45W wired charging still provides a reasonable charging speed, and the convenience of wireless charging can be a significant benefit for many users. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3's efficiency also means you may not need to top up as frequently.