Huawei Mate Xs 2 vs Honor Magic Vs: The Ultimate Foldable Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Magic Vs emerges as the overall winner, boasting superior performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, significantly better battery life, and a brighter display. While the Mate Xs 2 has a unique outward-folding design, the Magic Vs offers a more refined and practical experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate Xs 2 | Honor Magic Vs |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 28 | 2022, November 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 07 | Available. Released 2022, December 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 156.5 x 139.3 x 5.4 mmFolded: 156.5 x 75.5 x 11.1 mm | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 255 g / 257 g (8.99 oz) | 261 g / 267 g (9.21 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2200 x 2480 pixels (~424 ppi density) | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.8 inches, 195.8 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits |
| Folded cover display: OLED, 6.5 inches, 1176 x 2480 pixels | Cover display: OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 4G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | EMUI 12, no Google Play Services (International); HarmonyOS 2.0 (China) | Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 - InternationalAndroid 12, MagicOS 7 - China |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 10.7 MP, f/2.2 | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 81mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 81mm (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/240fps | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 10.7 MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 4600 mAh (w/ 8GB RAM)· Li-Po 4880 mAh (w/ 12GB RAM) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Cyan, Black, Orange |
| Models | PAL-AL00, PAL-LX9 | FRI-AN00, FRI-NX9 |
| Price | About 2000 EUR | About 2940 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 49h | Endurance rating 85h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) | -23.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 641608 (v9) GeekBench: 3131 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 831175 (v9) GeekBench: 3971 (v5.1), 4497 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate Xs 2
- Unique outward-folding design
- Relatively lightweight
- Decent camera system
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 888)
- Shorter battery life
- Potential software limitations (Huawei ecosystem)
Honor Magic Vs
- Superior performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Excellent battery life
- Brighter display
- More refined hinge mechanism
- Design less unique than Mate Xs 2
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic Vs takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 876 nits, significantly brighter than the Mate Xs 2's 725 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the Magic Vs's higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors. Both utilize flexible OLED panels, providing vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and requires more in-depth testing. Both phones feature versatile camera systems, but the Magic Vs likely benefits from the more powerful processor for image processing. Both offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed comparisons would require side-by-side testing.
Performance
The Honor Magic Vs's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is a clear winner here. It offers a substantial performance boost over the Mate Xs 2's Snapdragon 888, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Magic Vs handles demanding tasks with ease.
Battery Life
Battery life is a major advantage for the Honor Magic Vs. Its endurance rating of 85 hours significantly surpasses the Mate Xs 2's 49 hours. This translates to noticeably longer usage times between charges, making the Magic Vs a more practical choice for heavy users.
Buying Guide
The Huawei Mate Xs 2 is ideal for users who prioritize a unique, outward-folding design and are comfortable with potential software limitations. The Honor Magic Vs is a better choice for those seeking a more balanced foldable experience with top-tier performance, longer battery life, and a brighter, more vibrant display.