Huawei Mate X2 vs. Motorola Razr+ 2025: A Deep Dive into Folding Phone Excellence
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and a more modern chipset, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers superior efficiency and performance, while the inclusion of wireless charging adds convenience. However, the Mate X2’s endurance rating remains competitive.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate X2 | Motorola Razr+ 2025 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 22 | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 25 | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 161.8 x 145.8 x 8.2 mmFolded: 161.8 x 74.6 x 14.7 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 295 g (10.41 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2200 x 2480 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 8.0 inches, 206.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 90Hz | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: OLED, 90Hz, 6.45 inches, 1160 x 2700 pixels | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.X | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/4.4, 240mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Light Blue, Rose Gold, Collector’s Edition Black/White/Red | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | TET-AN00 | XT2451-1 |
| Price | About 2300 EUR | $ 500.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 74h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.8 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 632818 (v8) GeekBench: 14393 (v4.4), 3389 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Huawei Mate X2
- Exceptional battery endurance (74h rating)
- Large, immersive foldable display
- Potentially refined camera image processing
- Older Kirin 9000 chipset
- Lacks wireless charging
- Display brightness may be lower than newer models
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Modern Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Faster charging with wireless and reverse options
- More compact and potentially durable clamshell design
- Potentially lower battery endurance compared to Mate X2
- Smaller unfolded display size
- Camera performance details are unknown
Display Comparison
The Huawei Mate X2 boasts a large foldable display, achieving a measured peak brightness of 542 nits. While respectable, this is likely surpassed by the Razr+ 2025, given advancements in display technology since the Mate X2’s release. The Mate X2’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a high-quality panel, but lacks specific details. The Razr+ 2025, being a clamshell, will have a smaller cover display and a different aspect ratio when unfolded. The newer device likely benefits from improved hinge technology for reduced crease visibility, a common concern with early foldables.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Given Huawei’s historical strength in mobile photography, the Mate X2 likely features a more refined image processing pipeline. However, without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Razr+ 2025 benefits from newer image signal processors (ISPs) within the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, potentially offering improved low-light performance and computational photography features. The absence of details on either device’s camera systems necessitates caution; relying on brand reputation alone is insufficient.
Performance
The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) represents a significant leap in efficiency and performance over the Huawei Mate X2’s Kirin 9000 (5nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon allows for lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Razr+ 2025’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X4 prime core alongside A720 and A520 cores – is architecturally more advanced than the Mate X2’s Cortex-A77 and A55 setup. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. While the Kirin 9000 was a flagship chip in its time, it’s now demonstrably outpaced by the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate X2 achieves an impressive endurance rating of 74 hours, a testament to its large battery capacity and efficient software optimization. The Motorola Razr+ 2025, with an active use score of 10:12 hours, provides a more direct measure of real-world usage. Converting this to an endurance rating is difficult without knowing the test methodology, but it suggests a competitive, though potentially lower, battery life. The Razr+ 2025 compensates with faster charging – 45W wired, 15W wireless, and 5W reverse wired – compared to the Mate X2’s 55W wired only. The addition of wireless charging is a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate X2 if you prioritize proven endurance and a larger, more expansive unfolded display, and are comfortable with an older chipset. This is ideal for users who heavily consume media and value long-lasting battery life above all else. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you prefer a more compact, modern design with a cutting-edge processor, faster charging speeds, and the convenience of wireless charging. This is the better option for power users and those who want the latest technology.