Huawei Mate 80 vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle

The Huawei Mate 80 and Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent distinct approaches to the high-end smartphone market. The Mate 80, powered by Huawei’s Kirin 9020, aims for a balance of features, while the Find X7 Ultra leverages the latest Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 to deliver uncompromising performance. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and faster charging significantly outperform the Mate 80’s Kirin 9020, despite the Mate 80 offering competitive wireless charging capabilities.

PHONES
Phone Names Huawei Mate 80 Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, November 252024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, November 25Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum alloy frame, fiber-reinforced plastic backGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions161.9 x 76 x 8 mm (6.37 x 2.99 x 0.31 in)164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight217 g (7.65 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
ProtectionHuawei Kunlun Glass 2Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1280 x 2832 pixels (~460 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)
Size6.75 inches, 110.3 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1440Hz PWM, HDR VividLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.5 GHz & 3x2.15 GHz & 4x1.6 GHz)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetKirin 9020 (7 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUMaleoon 920Adreno 750
OSHarmonyOS 6.0Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDRLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5.5x optical zoom 40 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF-
Video4K, 1080p@240fps, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR Vivid4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaPanorama
Single13 MP, f/2.0, 18mm (ultrawide), AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth6.0, A2DP, LE, L2HC5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavICGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2USB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFace ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging66W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
Type5750 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, White, Green, GoldBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown
ModelsVYG-AL00PHY110, PHY120
PriceAbout 570 EUR$ 546.64

Huawei Mate 80

  • Robust wireless and reverse wired charging options.
  • Mature Huawei software ecosystem (for existing users).
  • Potentially more affordable price point.

  • Older Kirin 9020 chipset lags behind Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.
  • Slower wired charging compared to Oppo.
  • Display likely less bright than Oppo Find X7 Ultra.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

  • Industry-leading Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance.
  • Extremely fast 100W wired charging.
  • Brighter and potentially higher refresh rate display.

  • May have a higher price tag.
  • Software experience may be less refined than Huawei’s.
  • Relatively new model, potential for early software bugs.

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1165 nits, compared to an assumed lower peak brightness for the Mate 80 (based on typical Huawei flagship displays). This brightness advantage translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Mate 80 likely employs a high-quality OLED panel, the Find X7 Ultra’s brightness and potentially higher refresh rate (spec not provided, but expected) offer a more immersive viewing experience. Bezels are expected to be comparable, given both phones target the premium segment.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, Oppo’s Ultra series typically prioritizes camera innovation. The Find X7 Ultra likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms than the Mate 80. While Huawei is renowned for its computational photography, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) offers enhanced capabilities for noise reduction and dynamic range. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and apertures makes a definitive statement impossible, but Oppo’s focus on camera technology suggests a potential edge.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Huawei Mate 80’s Kirin 9020 (7nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.3 GHz, provides a significant single-core performance boost. The more efficient 4nm process also translates to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Find X7 Ultra’s CPU configuration (1x3.3GHz, 3x3.2GHz, 2x3.0GHz, 2x2.3GHz) is architecturally superior to the Mate 80’s (1x2.5GHz, 3x2.15GHz, 4x1.6GHz), promising faster app launches and smoother multitasking. While both utilize octa-core designs, the Snapdragon’s newer cores and process node provide a clear advantage.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s battery life is demonstrably superior, achieving 12:47h of active use. While the Mate 80’s battery capacity is unknown, the Find X7 Ultra’s endurance suggests a combination of efficient chipset and optimized software. Crucially, the Find X7 Ultra’s 100W wired charging (0-100% in 26 minutes, 50% in 10 minutes) is significantly faster than the Mate 80’s 66W wired charging. Both offer 50W wireless charging, but the Find X7 Ultra also includes 10W reverse wired charging, a feature the Mate 80 offers at 5W, providing more versatile power-sharing options.

Buying Guide

Buy the Huawei Mate 80 if you prioritize a mature software experience within the Huawei ecosystem and value a robust wireless charging solution with reverse wired charging. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you demand the absolute best Android performance, fastest wired charging speeds, and a brighter, more vibrant display, even if it means navigating a newer software experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Kirin 9020 chipset in the Huawei Mate 80 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Kirin 9020 is a capable chipset, but it will likely exhibit more thermal throttling and lower sustained performance in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Oppo Find X7 Ultra. Expect lower frame rates and potential stuttering during extended gaming sessions on the Mate 80.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the Oppo Find X7 Ultra compared to the 66W charging on the Huawei Mate 80 in real-world use?
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 100W charging can fully charge the device in approximately 26 minutes, while the Mate 80’s 66W charging will take considerably longer. This translates to a significant time saving, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The 50% in 10 minutes claim for the Oppo is a substantial advantage.
❓ Is the reverse wireless charging on the Huawei Mate 80 useful for charging accessories like earbuds?
The 5W reverse wireless charging on the Mate 80 is sufficient for slowly charging small accessories like earbuds or smartwatches, but it's not a rapid charging solution. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 10W reverse wireless charging offers a slightly faster, though still slow, charging experience for accessories.