Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Power

The Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max and Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent the pinnacle of Android smartphone engineering. While both aim for a premium experience, they diverge significantly in their core philosophies: Huawei leverages its in-house Kirin 9030 Pro chipset, while Oppo opts for Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. This comparison dissects these differences, focusing on real-world performance, charging capabilities, and overall user experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, built on a 4nm process, delivers superior efficiency and processing power. However, the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max’s impressive 100W wired and 80W wireless charging offer a compelling alternative for those prioritizing charging speed above all else.

PHONES
Phone Names Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, November 252024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, November 25Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum alloy frame, aluminum alloy backGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions164.4 x 79 x 8.3 mm (6.47 x 3.11 x 0.33 in)164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight239 g (8.43 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
ProtectionHuawei Kunlun Glass 2Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1320 x 2848 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~455 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)
Size6.9 inches, 117.2 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1440Hz PWM, HDR Vivid, 8000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPU9-core (1x2.75 GHz & 4x2.27 GHz & 4x1.72 GHz)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetKirin 9030 Pro (6 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUMaleoon 935Adreno 750
OSHarmonyOS 6.0Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal512GB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDRLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.1, 91mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.2, 140mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 6.2x optical zoom 40 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF
Video4K, 1080p@960fps, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR Vivid4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaPanorama
Single13 MP, f/2.0, 18mm (ultrawide), AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth6.0, A2DP, LE, L2HC5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavICGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2USB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFace ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging100W wired 80W wireless 20W reverse wireless 18W reverse wired100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
Type6000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Silver, Blue, GoldBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown
ModelsSGT-AL10PHY110, PHY120
PriceAbout 980 EUR$ 546.64

Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max

  • Industry-leading 100W wired and 80W wireless charging
  • Potentially excellent image processing from Huawei’s algorithms
  • 20W reverse wired charging for versatile power sharing

  • Kirin 9030 Pro’s 6nm process may lead to thermal throttling
  • Limited information on display specifications
  • Potential software ecosystem limitations

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

  • Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 delivers superior performance and efficiency
  • High peak display brightness (1165 nits) for outdoor visibility
  • Strong battery life (12:47h active use)

  • Wireless charging speed is lower than Huawei (50W vs 80W)
  • Reverse wireless charging is limited to 10W
  • May lack some of Huawei’s unique software features

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1165 nits, suggesting a significantly more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max (brightness data unavailable). While both likely employ high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels, the Oppo’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor usability. The absence of detailed display specs for the Huawei suggests Oppo has a clear edge in this category, potentially utilizing LTPO technology for variable refresh rates and improved power efficiency.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Ultra branding of the Oppo Find X7 Ultra, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing. The focus will likely be on computational photography and low-light performance. Huawei typically excels in image processing, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is a significant upgrade, potentially closing the gap or even surpassing Huawei’s capabilities. The absence of information on OIS and lens apertures hinders a more precise assessment.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A720 cores at 3.2 GHz and two Cortex-A720 cores at 3.0 GHz, plus two Cortex-A520 cores at 2.3 GHz. This configuration, built on a 4nm process, promises superior performance and thermal efficiency compared to the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max’s Kirin 9030 Pro (6nm). The Kirin’s 9-core architecture (1x2.75 GHz, 4x2.27 GHz, 4x1.72 GHz) is complex, but the larger node size suggests potential throttling under sustained load. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s architectural advantages translate to a smoother experience in demanding games and applications.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a real-world active use score of 12 hours and 47 minutes, providing a concrete benchmark for battery life. While the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max’s battery capacity is unknown, its charging capabilities are exceptional: 100W wired, 80W wireless, and 20W reverse wireless. The Oppo supports 100W wired (50% in 10 minutes, 100% in 26 minutes) and 50W wireless. The Huawei’s higher wireless charging speed is a significant advantage, but the Oppo’s efficient Snapdragon chipset and demonstrated battery life suggest a balanced approach. The 20W reverse wired charging on the Huawei is also higher than the Oppo's 10W.

Buying Guide

Buy the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds available, both wired and wirelessly, and are comfortable with Huawei’s ecosystem. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prioritize top-tier gaming performance, sustained CPU/GPU power, and a more universally compatible software experience. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a smoother, more efficient experience for demanding tasks.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Kirin 9030 Pro in the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Kirin 9030 Pro, built on a 6nm process, is more susceptible to thermal throttling compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm architecture. While Huawei employs cooling solutions, prolonged gaming at maximum settings may result in reduced performance to manage heat.
❓ How does the 100W charging on the Oppo Find X7 Ultra compare to the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max in real-world usage?
Both phones offer 100W wired charging, but the Huawei Mate 80 Pro Max also boasts 80W wireless charging, a significant advantage. While the Oppo charges to 100% in 26 minutes, the Huawei’s wireless charging capability provides unparalleled convenience, even if slightly slower.
❓ Is the difference in chipset architecture (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Kirin 9030 Pro) noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference is minimal. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s superior efficiency and processing power become apparent in demanding applications like video editing, graphic-intensive games, and multitasking.
❓ What are the implications of using Huawei’s ecosystem versus a more open Android experience with the Oppo?
Huawei’s ecosystem, while feature-rich, may lack full compatibility with Google Mobile Services (GMS) depending on the region. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra offers a more standard Android experience with full GMS support, providing access to a wider range of apps and services.