Huawei Mate 70 vs vivo X100 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the vivo X100 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9300 chipset, coupled with a measured 1472 nits peak brightness, provides a smoother, more visually vibrant experience. However, the Mate 70’s wireless charging versatility offers a unique advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 70 | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 26 | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 26 | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm (6.33 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass 2 | - |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2688 pixels (~440 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz & 3x2.15 GHz & 4x1.6 GHz) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9020 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Maleoon 920 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.3 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 40 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 50W wireless 7.5W reverse wireless 5W reverse wired | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | 5300 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, White, Green | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | CLS-AL00 | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | About 720 EUR | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Huawei Mate 70
- Versatile wireless charging (50W + reverse options)
- Potentially strong ecosystem integration (Huawei)
- Refined software experience (Huawei)
- Less powerful chipset (Kirin 9020)
- Limited display brightness information
- Camera specs largely unknown
vivo X100 Pro
- Superior processing power (Dimensity 9300)
- Brighter display (1472 nits)
- Fast 100W wired charging
- Less versatile wireless charging
- Potential for software bloat (vivo)
- Reliance on MediaTek chipset updates
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1472 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Mate 70 (brightness data unavailable). While both support wireless charging, the X100 Pro’s superior brightness is a tangible benefit for outdoor visibility. The absence of refresh rate information for the Mate 70 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X100 Pro likely benefits from LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates and power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are positioned as camera powerhouses, but details beyond 'Photo/Video' for the Mate 70 are lacking. The X100 Pro’s camera system is likely to feature larger sensors and more advanced image processing, given vivo’s focus on camera technology. The X100 Pro’s lens apertures and OIS capabilities will be critical for low-light performance, areas where the Mate 70’s specifications are currently unknown. Without sensor size or aperture data for the Mate 70, it’s difficult to assess its photographic capabilities against the X100 Pro.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: Huawei’s 7nm Kirin 9020 versus MediaTek’s 4nm Dimensity 9300. The Dimensity 9300’s smaller node promises superior power efficiency and thermal management, crucial for sustained performance. The Dimensity 9300’s CPU configuration – featuring Cortex-X4 cores – is geared towards peak performance, with a 3.25 GHz clock speed exceeding the Kirin 9020’s 2.5 GHz. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the X100 Pro. The X100 Pro’s use of LPDDR5x RAM further enhances memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The vivo X100 Pro delivers a compelling battery life, achieving 13:53 hours of active use. While the Mate 70’s battery capacity is unknown, its charging speeds offer interesting trade-offs. The X100 Pro’s 100W wired charging can reach 50% charge in just 14 minutes, while the Mate 70’s 66W wired charging is slower. However, the Mate 70 stands out with 50W wireless charging and both 7.5W and 5W reverse wireless/wired charging, offering greater versatility for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 70 if you need a phone with robust wireless charging options – both for itself and other devices – and are deeply integrated into the Huawei ecosystem. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you prioritize top-tier processing power for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions.