Huawei Mate 70 RS Ultimate vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle

The Huawei Mate 70 RS Ultimate and the Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent the pinnacle of Android smartphone engineering. While both aim for the ultra-premium segment, they diverge significantly in their core philosophies: Huawei relying on its in-house Kirin silicon and a focus on luxury materials, while Oppo leverages Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon and a cutting-edge camera system. This comparison dissects these differences to reveal which device delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, coupled with a measured 1165 nits peak brightness, provides a smoother, more responsive experience. However, the Mate 70 RS Ultimate’s impressive charging speeds and unique design appeal to a niche audience valuing those features.

PHONES
Phone Names Huawei Mate 70 RS Ultimate Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, November 262024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, December 19Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
BuildGlass front, titanium alloy frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions164.6 x 79.5 x 8.3 mm (6.48 x 3.13 x 0.33 in)164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight251 g or 256 g (8.85 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
ProtectionHuawei Kunlun Glass (basalt tempered)Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1316 x 2832 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)
Size6.9 inches, 117.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeDual-layer LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3500 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.5 GHz & 3x2.15 GHz & 4x1.6 GHz)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetKirin 9020 (7 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUMaleoon 920Adreno 750
OSHarmonyOS 4.3Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDRLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.1, 93mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 40 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF-
Video4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaPanorama
Single13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video4K, 1080p4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavICGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2USB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFace ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging100W wired 80W wireless 20W reverse wireless 18W reverse wired100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 5700 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, White, RedBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown
ModelsPLU-AL10PHY110, PHY120
PriceAbout 1580 EUR$ 546.64

Huawei Mate 70 RS Ultimate

  • Industry-leading 80W wireless charging
  • Unique and luxurious design aesthetic
  • Fast 100W wired charging

  • Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  • Limited information on display specifications

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

  • Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  • Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
  • Excellent battery life (12:47h active use)

  • Wireless charging slower than Mate 70 RS Ultimate
  • Potentially less distinctive design

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1165 nits, compared to an unstated peak brightness for the Mate 70 RS Ultimate. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely employ high refresh rate panels, the Oppo’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor users. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO or not) are missing for the Mate 70 RS Ultimate, but the Find X7 Ultra’s brightness suggests a modern, power-efficient display.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs for the Mate 70 RS Ultimate, a direct comparison is limited. However, Oppo’s Find X7 Ultra is known for its advanced camera system. The focus should be on sensor sizes and image processing. The Oppo’s likely utilizes larger sensors and more sophisticated image processing algorithms, resulting in superior low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of details regarding the Mate 70 RS Ultimate’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities beyond speculation.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is built on a more advanced process node than the Huawei Mate 70 RS Ultimate’s Kirin 9020 (7nm). This 4nm process generally leads to improved thermal efficiency and higher sustained performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s CPU configuration – 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520 – is also architecturally superior to the Kirin 9020’s octa-core setup, promising faster processing speeds and better multi-tasking capabilities. While the Kirin 9020 is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a clear performance advantage, particularly in demanding tasks like gaming.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a real-world active use score of 12 hours and 47 minutes, indicating excellent battery life. While the Mate 70 RS Ultimate’s battery capacity is unknown, its charging capabilities are noteworthy: 100W wired, 80W wireless, and 20W reverse wireless. The Oppo also supports 100W wired charging, reaching 100% in 26 minutes, and 50W wireless charging. The Mate 70 RS Ultimate’s 80W wireless charging is a significant advantage, potentially offsetting a smaller battery capacity for users who frequently utilize wireless charging.

Buying Guide

Buy the Huawei Mate 70 RS Ultimate if you prioritize exceptional charging speeds (100W wired and 80W wireless), a distinctive and luxurious design, and are comfortable with the Huawei ecosystem. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you demand the absolute best performance from a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a longer-lasting battery life based on active use testing.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Kirin 9020 chipset in the Mate 70 RS Ultimate suffer from significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
Given the 7nm process node and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s superior thermal efficiency, the Kirin 9020 is more likely to experience throttling under sustained load. While Huawei employs cooling solutions, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm architecture provides a fundamental advantage in heat dissipation.
❓ How does the 80W wireless charging on the Mate 70 RS Ultimate compare to the 50W wireless charging on the Oppo Find X7 Ultra in terms of real-world charging time?
While the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 50W wireless charging is respectable, the Mate 70 RS Ultimate’s 80W wireless charging will significantly reduce charging times. Expect a noticeably faster wireless charging experience with the Huawei device, potentially adding several hours of use with a shorter charging session.
❓ Is the reverse wireless charging feature on both phones useful for charging accessories like earbuds or smartwatches?
Yes, both phones offer reverse wireless charging, but the Mate 70 RS Ultimate provides a higher wattage (20W) compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra (10W). This means the Huawei device can charge accessories faster, making it a more practical option for topping up smaller devices on the go.