Huawei Mate 70 Pro+ vs. Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle

The Huawei Mate 70 Pro+ and Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent the pinnacle of Android smartphone engineering, but they take distinctly different approaches. Huawei, navigating ongoing restrictions, relies on its in-house Kirin 9020 chipset, while Oppo leverages the industry-leading Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. This comparison dissects these core differences and examines which phone delivers the best overall experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, built on a 4nm process, offers a significant advantage in efficiency and power. However, Huawei's 100W wireless charging and unique software experience make the Mate 70 Pro+ a compelling alternative for loyal Huawei users.

PHONES
Phone Names Huawei Mate 70 Pro+ Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, November 262024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, November 26Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
BuildGlass front, titanium alloy frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions164.6 x 79.5 x 8.3 mm (6.48 x 3.13 x 0.33 in)164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight226 g (7.97 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
ProtectionHuawei Kunlun Glass 2Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1316 x 2832 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)
Size6.9 inches, 117.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2500 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.5 GHz Taishan Big & 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid & 4x1.53GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetKirin 9020 (7 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUMaleoon 920Adreno 750
OSHarmonyOS 4.3Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDRLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.1, 93mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 40 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF-
Video4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaPanorama
Single13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavICGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2USB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFace ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging100W wired 80W wireless 20W reverse wireless 18W reverse wired100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 5700 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Gray, White, GreenBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown
ModelsPLA-AL10PHY110, PHY120
PriceAbout 1120 EUR$ 546.64

Huawei Mate 70 Pro+

  • Industry-leading 80W wireless charging
  • Unique Huawei software experience
  • Potentially innovative camera features

  • Kirin 9020 chipset may lag behind Snapdragon in performance
  • 7nm process less efficient than 4nm
  • Limited availability in some markets

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

  • Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 delivers top-tier performance
  • 4nm process for improved efficiency and thermal management
  • Excellent battery life (12:47h active use)

  • Wireless charging slower than Huawei (50W)
  • More generic Android software experience
  • May lack some of Huawei's unique software features

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1165 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Mate 70 Pro+, where brightness data is currently unavailable. While both likely employ high-refresh-rate panels, the Oppo’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor use. The absence of detailed display specs for the Huawei suggests Oppo has a clear advantage in this area, potentially utilizing LTPO technology for variable refresh rates and improved efficiency.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specs are missing for both devices, but the market positioning suggests a focus on high-resolution sensors. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is expected to feature a sophisticated multi-camera system, likely with a large main sensor and advanced image processing. Huawei has a strong history of computational photography, and the Mate 70 Pro+ will likely leverage its Kirin chipset’s NPU for enhanced image processing. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but Oppo’s investment in camera technology suggests a competitive advantage.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz. This contrasts with the Huawei Mate 70 Pro+'s Kirin 9020 (7nm), which utilizes a Taishan architecture. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon offers superior thermal efficiency, meaning the Oppo is less likely to throttle under sustained load. The Snapdragon’s architecture also provides a more mature and optimized software ecosystem for developers. While the Kirin 9020 is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a clear performance lead, particularly in GPU-intensive tasks.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates impressive real-world battery performance, achieving 12:47h of active use. While the Mate 70 Pro+’s battery capacity is unknown, its charging capabilities are noteworthy: 100W wired, 80W wireless, and 20W reverse wireless. The Oppo supports 100W wired charging (0-100% in 26 minutes) and 50W wireless charging. Huawei’s 80W wireless charging is a significant advantage, offering faster wireless top-ups. The Oppo’s longer battery life, combined with fast wired charging, provides a more convenient user experience, but Huawei’s wireless charging speed is a compelling differentiator.

Buying Guide

Buy the Huawei Mate 70 Pro+ if you prioritize wireless charging convenience, a distinct software ecosystem, and are comfortable with the Kirin chipset's performance profile. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you demand the absolute best performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value a more mainstream Android experience with faster charging speeds and longer sustained performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Kirin 9020 chipset in the Huawei Mate 70 Pro+ suffer from significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
Given the 7nm process and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3's 4nm efficiency, the Kirin 9020 is more likely to experience thermal throttling under sustained heavy load, such as prolonged gaming. While Huawei employs cooling solutions, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3's inherent efficiency provides a performance advantage in this scenario.
❓ How does the 100W wired charging on the Oppo Find X7 Ultra compare to the Huawei Mate 70 Pro+ in real-world usage?
Both phones offer 100W wired charging, but the Oppo Find X7 Ultra reaches 100% in 26 minutes. While Huawei's charging speed is comparable, the Oppo's overall battery life of 12:47h means you'll need to charge less frequently, making the charging speed less critical.
❓ Is the 20W reverse wireless charging on the Huawei Mate 70 Pro+ useful for charging accessories like earbuds or smartwatches?
While 20W reverse wireless charging is present, it's relatively slow compared to dedicated wireless chargers. It's suitable for topping up small accessories, but not ideal for quickly charging larger devices like another smartphone. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra offers only 10W reverse wireless charging, making both options similarly limited in practical use.