Huawei Mate 70 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: The Ultimate Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance, a mature software ecosystem, and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the safer bet. However, the Huawei Mate 70 Pro’s blazing-fast 100W charging and potentially unique software experience make it a strong contender for those seeking innovation.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 70 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 26 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 26 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 79.5 x 8.2 mm (6.48 x 3.13 x 0.32 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 221 g (7.80 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass 2 | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1316 x 2832 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 117.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2500 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz & 3x2.15 GHz & 4x1.6 GHz) - PLR-AL00Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz & 3x2.0 GHz & 4x1.6 GHz) - PLR-AL50 | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9020 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Maleoon 920 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.3 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.1, 93mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 40 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired 80W wireless 20W reverse wireless 18W reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, White, Green | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | PLR-AL00, PLR-AL50 | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | About 860 EUR | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Huawei Mate 70 Pro
- Blazing-fast 100W wired charging
- 80W wireless charging is significantly faster than S24 Ultra
- Potentially unique software features and ecosystem
- Kirin 9020 chipset may not match Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in sustained performance
- Software ecosystem and app compatibility may be limited
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Mature software ecosystem and long-term support
- Slower charging speeds compared to Mate 70 Pro
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1447 nits measured, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Mate 70 Pro’s display specs are not provided, Huawei typically employs OLED panels; however, without nit figures, it’s difficult to assess its outdoor performance. The S24 Ultra’s likely use of LTPO technology allows for dynamic refresh rate scaling, conserving battery life, a feature we expect but cannot confirm for the Mate 70 Pro. The S24 Ultra’s superior brightness and confirmed LTPO tech give it a clear edge for users who spend significant time outdoors or prioritize battery efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to deliver excellent camera performance, but details are limited for the Mate 70 Pro. The S24 Ultra’s camera system is renowned for its versatility and image processing. While sensor sizes and apertures are unknown for the Mate 70 Pro, the S24 Ultra’s likely features a large main sensor with advanced OIS, enabling exceptional low-light photography and stable video recording. Huawei’s strength traditionally lies in computational photography, so the Mate 70 Pro could excel in specific scenarios. However, without detailed specifications, the S24 Ultra’s established reputation and likely superior hardware give it an advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: Huawei’s Kirin 9020 (7nm) versus Samsung’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, fabricated on a more advanced 4nm process, inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal headroom. Its CPU configuration – a 1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 prime core alongside three 3.1GHz Cortex-A720 cores – is designed for sustained peak performance. The Kirin 9020, while utilizing an octa-core setup, operates on a less efficient 7nm node. While the Kirin 9020’s clock speeds are competitive, the Snapdragon’s architectural advantages and process node translate to superior sustained performance, particularly in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The S24 Ultra’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances memory bandwidth, contributing to a smoother overall experience.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra achieves an impressive 13:49h of active use, demonstrating excellent battery endurance. The Mate 70 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging: 100W wired, 80W wireless, and even 20W reverse wireless. The S24 Ultra offers 45W wired, 15W wireless, and 4.5W reverse wireless. While the Mate 70 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the 100W charging allows for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the S24 Ultra’s 65% in 30 minutes. This makes the Mate 70 Pro ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, even if the overall battery life isn’t as long as the S24 Ultra’s.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 70 Pro if you need unparalleled charging speeds, are comfortable with Huawei’s ecosystem, and prioritize a potentially more unique software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you prefer a polished, feature-rich experience, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and the assurance of widespread app compatibility and long-term software support.