Huawei Mate 70 Air vs. Oppo Find X7 Ultra: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?

The Huawei Mate 70 Air and Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent distinct approaches to the premium smartphone market. The Mate 70 Air, leveraging Huawei’s Kirin chipset, aims for a balance of features and price, while the Find X7 Ultra, powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, prioritizes raw performance and cutting-edge camera technology. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing speed and charging convenience, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and 100W charging significantly outperform the Mate 70 Air’s Kirin 9020A and 66W charging. However, the Mate 70 Air may appeal to those seeking a potentially more affordable option.

PHONES
Phone Names Huawei Mate 70 Air Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, November 062024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, November 06Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions165 x 81.5 x 6.6 mm (6.50 x 3.21 x 0.26 in)164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight208 g (7.34 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
ProtectionKunlun GlassCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1320 x 2760 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~437 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)
Size7.0 inches, 123.0 cm2 (~91.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR Vivid, 4000 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-coreOcta-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetKirin 9020A (7 nm) - 12GB RAMKirin 9020B (7 nm) - 16GB RAMQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPU-Adreno 750
OSHarmonyOS 5.1Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDRLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 69mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide)-
Video4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaPanorama
Single10.7 MP, f/2.2, (wide)32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video4K, 1080p4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavICGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging66W wired 5W reverse wired100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 6500 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, White, SilverBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown
ModelsSUP-AL90PHY110, PHY120
PriceAbout 510 EUR$ 546.64

Huawei Mate 70 Air

  • Potentially more affordable price point
  • Huawei ecosystem integration
  • Available in multiple RAM configurations (12GB/16GB)

  • Less powerful chipset (Kirin 9020A/B)
  • Slower charging speed (66W)
  • Limited display information available

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

  • Superior performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)
  • Ultra-fast charging (100W wired, 50W wireless)
  • High peak display brightness (1165 nits)

  • Likely higher price tag
  • Potential for software bloat (Oppo's ColorOS)
  • Larger size and weight compared to the 'Air' variant

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1165 nits, suggesting a significantly more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Mate 70 Air, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Find X7 Ultra’s higher brightness and potential for LTPO technology (common in Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 flagships) would contribute to a smoother, more power-efficient viewing experience. The absence of detailed display specs for the Mate 70 Air leaves a gap in assessing its visual quality.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications for the Mate 70 Air, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra is expected to feature a sophisticated camera system, likely including large sensors and advanced image processing algorithms. The Find X7 Ultra’s focus on camera technology, a hallmark of the Find X series, suggests a superior photography experience, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of information regarding the Mate 70 Air’s sensor sizes and lens apertures makes it difficult to assess its photographic capabilities accurately. We can assume the Oppo will have a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) due to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.

Performance

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) chipset represents a substantial leap in performance and efficiency over the Huawei Mate 70 Air’s Kirin 9020A/9020B (7nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.3 GHz, combined with its advanced architecture, delivers faster processing speeds and improved graphics performance. The 4nm process node also translates to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones feature octa-core CPUs, the architectural differences and process node give the Oppo a clear advantage. The Mate 70 Air’s RAM options (12GB/16GB) are competitive, but the Snapdragon’s overall system-on-chip (SoC) efficiency is a key differentiator.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra excels in charging speed, offering 100W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 10 minutes and 100% in 26 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Huawei Mate 70 Air’s 66W wired charging. The Find X7 Ultra also supports 50W wireless charging, a feature absent in the Mate 70 Air. While the Find X7 Ultra’s active use battery score of 12:47h is a valuable metric, the Mate 70 Air’s battery capacity is unknown. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the Oppo, while the Mate 70 Air’s Kirin chipset may require more power for comparable tasks.

Buying Guide

Buy the Huawei Mate 70 Air if you need a capable flagship experience without the absolute highest price tag, and if you are comfortable with the Huawei ecosystem. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prioritize top-tier performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if rapid charging and a potentially superior camera system are essential to your mobile experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Kirin 9020A chipset in the Mate 70 Air suffer from significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
Given the 7nm process node and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s superior thermal efficiency, the Kirin 9020A is more likely to experience throttling under sustained heavy loads like gaming. While Huawei employs cooling solutions, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s 4nm architecture provides a fundamental advantage in heat dissipation.
❓ How does the 100W SuperVOOC charging on the Oppo Find X7 Ultra compare to other fast charging standards in terms of heat generation?
Oppo’s SuperVOOC charging is known for its efficiency and relatively low heat generation compared to some other fast charging technologies. While 100W is a high wattage, Oppo’s implementation focuses on maintaining safe temperatures through optimized charging protocols and heat management systems.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs for the Huawei Mate 70 Air a cause for concern regarding its image quality?
Yes, the absence of information regarding sensor size, lens aperture, and image processing capabilities raises concerns about the Mate 70 Air’s camera performance. Without these details, it’s difficult to assess its ability to compete with the Oppo Find X7 Ultra, which is expected to have a more advanced camera system.