Huawei Mate 60 Pro vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Clash of Chipset Philosophies
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a polished software experience and exceptional computational photography, the Google Pixel 8 Pro is the stronger choice. However, the Huawei Mate 60 Pro offers a unique proposition with its domestically produced chipset and impressive 66W charging, appealing to users seeking independence and speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 60 | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 29 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September 10 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 76 x 8 mm (6.35 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2688 pixels (~441 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.69 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~88.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big & 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid & 4x1.53GHz Cortex-A510) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000S (7 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Maleoon 910 MP4 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.0 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR Vivid, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, HDR Vivid | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | Li-Po 4750 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green, Purple | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | ALN-AL00, BRA-AL00 | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | About 750 EUR | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
Huawei Mate 60
- Blazing-fast 66W wired charging
- 50W wireless charging
- Domestically produced Kirin 9000S chipset
- Potential for unique software features
- Software experience may be less polished
- Limited global availability
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera software and computational photography
- Seamless Android experience with long-term support
- Bright and efficient LTPO display
- Powerful Tensor G3 chipset
- Slower charging speeds (30W wired, 23W wireless)
- Price premium
Display Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1600 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Mate 60 Pro’s display specs aren’t detailed, Huawei typically employs high-quality OLED panels. The Pixel 8 Pro’s LTPO technology allows for a variable refresh rate, dynamically adjusting between 1Hz and 120Hz to conserve battery life – a feature absent in the provided Mate 60 Pro specs. This impacts battery efficiency during static content viewing. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, but color accuracy and calibration are areas where Google’s expertise typically shines.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s advanced image processing algorithms. While specific sensor details are missing for both phones, the Pixel 8 Pro’s camera system is expected to feature a large main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS). Huawei has historically excelled in camera hardware, and the Mate 60 Pro likely incorporates a high-resolution sensor. However, the Pixel 8 Pro’s strength lies in its software – features like Magic Eraser, Photo Unblur, and Best Take are significant differentiators. The absence of details regarding the Mate 60 Pro’s camera features suggests a greater reliance on hardware capabilities, potentially lacking the same level of software refinement.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset fabrication process: the Kirin 9000S is built on a 7nm process, while the Tensor G3 utilizes a more advanced 4nm node. This 4nm process generally translates to improved thermal efficiency and power consumption for the Pixel 8 Pro, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Tensor G3’s nona-core CPU, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core, is designed for peak performance, while the Kirin 9000S employs a Taishan architecture for its big cores. The Pixel 8 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3, 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) suggests a focus on both single-core and multi-core performance. The Mate 60 Pro’s mix of Taishan and Cortex-A510 cores is less conventional, and real-world performance will depend heavily on software optimization. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, but the speed and capacity aren’t specified.
Battery Life
The Pixel 8 Pro achieves an impressive 11:14h of active use, and an endurance rating of 90 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The Mate 60 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging: 66W wired, capable of a full charge in 30 minutes, and 50W wireless. The Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W wired charging (with PD3.0 and PPS support) and 23W wireless charging are considerably slower. The Mate 60 Pro also offers 5W reverse wireless charging. While the Pixel 8 Pro’s larger battery capacity contributes to its endurance, the Mate 60 Pro prioritizes charging speed, offering a quick top-up for users on the go. The Pixel 8 Pro also features 'bypass charging' which reduces battery degradation.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 60 Pro if you need blazing-fast 66W wired and 50W wireless charging, and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. You'll also be supporting a company pushing boundaries in chip manufacturing under challenging circumstances. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prioritize a seamless Android experience, industry-leading camera software, and long-term software support, even if it means slower charging speeds.