Huawei Mate 60 Pro vs vivo X90 Pro+: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X90 Pro+ emerges as the stronger all-rounder. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers demonstrably superior performance and efficiency, translating to smoother gaming and longer battery life. While the Mate 60 Pro’s Kirin chip is impressive given the constraints, it can’t match the Snapdragon’s capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 60 Pro | vivo X90 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 29 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 29 | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 79 x 8.1 mm (6.44 x 3.11 x 0.32 in) | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass 2 | - |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2720 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 114.4 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big & 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid & 4x1.53GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000S (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Maleoon 910 MP4 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.0 (China) | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 88W wired, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless 20W reverse wireless | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green, Purple | Black, Red |
| Models | ALN-AL00, ALN-AL80 | V2227A |
| Price | About 890 EUR | About 1030 EUR |
Huawei Mate 60 Pro
- Potentially faster wired charging (88W)
- Unique Kirin 9000S chipset
- Reverse wireless charging (20W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- 7nm process may lead to higher thermal throttling
- Software ecosystem limitations outside of China
vivo X90 Pro+
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- More efficient chipset for longer battery life
- Globally supported software and updates
- Slightly slower wired charging (80W)
- May lack unique features of the Mate 60 Pro
- Reverse charging is wired only
Display Comparison
While detailed display specs are missing, both phones target a premium experience. The X90 Pro+ likely benefits from a more mature panel supply chain, potentially offering slightly better color accuracy and brightness. However, without specific nit ratings, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. Both are expected to feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays, but the Mate 60 Pro’s PWM dimming rate (if higher) would be a benefit for users sensitive to flicker.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to feature sophisticated camera systems, but the X90 Pro+ likely has an edge. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, vivo’s Pro+ line historically prioritizes large sensors. The Snapdragon’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also highly optimized for image processing. The Mate 60 Pro’s camera performance will depend heavily on Huawei’s computational photography algorithms, but the underlying hardware disadvantage is notable. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro lens found on both, the primary and ultrawide sensors will be the key differentiators.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the vivo X90 Pro+ (4nm process) holds a significant advantage over the Kirin 9000S (7nm process). The smaller node allows for greater transistor density and improved thermal efficiency. The Snapdragon’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.2 GHz, outperforms the Kirin’s Taishan big core at 2.62 GHz. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and higher sustained performance in demanding games. The X90 Pro+’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances memory bandwidth, contributing to a snappier user experience.
Battery Life
The vivo X90 Pro+ advertises a 0-100% charge in 33 minutes with 80W wired charging, while the Mate 60 Pro claims 30 minutes with 88W. This suggests comparable wired charging speeds, with the Mate 60 Pro having a slight edge. Both offer 50W wireless charging. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior efficiency means the X90 Pro+ is likely to deliver longer real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity battery. The Mate 60 Pro’s 20W reverse wireless charging is a useful addition, while the X90 Pro+ offers reverse *wired* charging, a potentially more versatile feature.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 60 Pro if you prioritize a unique, domestically-sourced chipset and are invested in the Huawei ecosystem, potentially valuing its satellite communication features (not detailed in provided specs). Buy the vivo X90 Pro+ if you demand the highest possible Android performance, a consistently excellent camera experience, and a more globally-supported software experience.