Huawei Mate 60 Pro vs Oppo Find X6 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X6 Pro emerges as the stronger all-rounder. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers consistently higher performance and better thermal management, while its excellent display and camera system are complemented by a mature software experience. However, the Mate 60 Pro’s Kirin chip and satellite communication capabilities offer a compelling alternative for those prioritizing innovation and independence.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 60 Pro | Oppo Find X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 29 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 29 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 79 x 8.1 mm (6.44 x 3.11 x 0.32 in) | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2720 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 114.4 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big & 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid & 4x1.53GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000S (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Maleoon 910 MP4 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.0 (China) | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 88W wired, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless 20W reverse wireless | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green, Purple | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | ALN-AL00, ALN-AL80 | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | About 890 EUR | About 820 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9) GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 60 Pro
- Innovative Kirin 9000S chipset
- Satellite communication capabilities
- Potentially faster reverse wireless charging
- Less efficient 7nm chipset
- Limited software ecosystem
- Unspecified display brightness
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Relies on Qualcomm ecosystem
- No satellite communication
- Standard 10W reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1318 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Mate 60 Pro. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely employ high-refresh-rate panels, the Find X6 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a superior OLED panel. The lack of detailed display specs for the Mate 60 Pro leaves a question mark over its color accuracy and viewing angles, areas where Oppo typically excels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are positioned as camera powerhouses, but specifics are limited. The Oppo Find X6 Pro likely leverages a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms, typical of Oppo’s flagship offerings. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Mate 60 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but Huawei’s history suggests a focus on computational photography and AI-powered scene optimization. The Find X6 Pro’s established reputation for video recording quality gives it an edge in this category. We can assume both phones offer excellent photo and video capabilities, but the Oppo likely has a more refined and consistent output.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is built on a more efficient process node than the Huawei Mate 60 Pro’s Kirin 9000S (7nm). This 4nm process allows for higher transistor density and improved thermal efficiency, meaning the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is less prone to throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Snapdragon’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X3 prime core – also offers a performance advantage over the Mate 60 Pro’s Taishan architecture. While the Kirin 9000S is a remarkable feat of engineering given the restrictions Huawei faces, it’s unlikely to match the Snapdragon’s raw processing power.
Battery Life
Both devices offer a 30-minute full charge, but the Oppo Find X6 Pro achieves 45% charge in just 10 minutes with its 100W wired charging, while the Mate 60 Pro takes the full 30 minutes to reach 100% with its 88W charging. The Find X6 Pro also boasts faster wireless charging at 50W (100% in 51 minutes) compared to the Mate 60 Pro’s 50W (100% in an unspecified time). Both offer reverse wireless charging, but the Oppo’s 10W output is lower than the Mate 60 Pro’s 20W. Despite the Mate 60 Pro’s potentially larger battery capacity (unspecified), the Oppo’s faster charging speeds provide a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 60 Pro if you need a phone that prioritizes technological independence, potentially benefits from future software enhancements tailored to the Kirin chip, and value the satellite communication feature. Buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro if you prefer a consistently high-performing device with a proven track record, a vibrant and bright display, and a more refined software experience backed by Qualcomm’s ecosystem.