Huawei Mate 60 Pro vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Clash of Silicon and Software
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a polished software experience, exceptional camera processing, and long-term software support, the Google Pixel 8 Pro is the stronger choice. However, the Huawei Mate 60 Pro’s Kirin 9000S offers a compelling alternative for those seeking a unique hardware experience and aren't reliant on the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 60 Pro | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 29 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 29 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 79 x 8.1 mm (6.44 x 3.11 x 0.32 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Huawei Kunlun Glass 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2720 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 114.4 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big & 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid & 4x1.53GHz Cortex-A510) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000S (7 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Maleoon 910 MP4 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.0 (China) | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 88W wired, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless 20W reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green, Purple | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | ALN-AL00, ALN-AL80 | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | About 890 EUR | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
Huawei Mate 60 Pro
- Incredibly fast 88W wired charging
- Kirin 9000S represents a technological achievement
- 50W wireless charging and 20W reverse wireless
- Software ecosystem may be limited compared to Google
- 7nm chipset may be less efficient than 4nm alternatives
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera processing and AI features
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Bright and efficient LTPO display
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Tensor G3 may not match raw CPU/GPU performance of competitors
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 8 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 1600 nits peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Mate 60 Pro’s display specs aren’t detailed, Huawei typically employs high-quality OLED panels. The Pixel 8 Pro’s brightness advantage is significant, and its LTPO technology likely contributes to more efficient power consumption. The Pixel 8 Pro’s display is geared towards outdoor usability and power efficiency, while the Mate 60 Pro’s display quality will likely be very good, but potentially less impactful in bright conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to deliver excellent camera performance, but approach it differently. The Pixel 8 Pro is renowned for its computational photography, leveraging Google’s AI algorithms to produce stunning images. While specific sensor details for the Mate 60 Pro are unavailable, Huawei has a strong track record in camera technology. The Pixel 8 Pro’s image processing prioritizes realistic colors and dynamic range, while Huawei often leans towards more vibrant and saturated images. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video capabilities are also likely to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G3’s dedicated image processing unit. The absence of detailed sensor information for the Mate 60 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Pixel 8 Pro’s software advantage is substantial.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 8 Pro utilizes the Google Tensor G3, a 4nm nona-core processor designed for AI and machine learning tasks. The Huawei Mate 60 Pro, however, features the Kirin 9000S, a 7nm chip. While the Kirin 9000S is a remarkable achievement given the constraints Huawei faces, the 4nm process of the Tensor G3 generally translates to better thermal efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance. The Tensor G3’s Cortex-X3 core (3.0 GHz) provides a performance edge over the Kirin’s Taishan big core (2.62 GHz). The Pixel 8 Pro’s focus on AI processing will be noticeable in features like Magic Eraser and real-time translation, while the Mate 60 Pro will likely excel in raw processing power for certain tasks.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 8 Pro achieves an impressive 11:14h of active use, and an endurance rating of 90 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Huawei Mate 60 Pro offers significantly faster charging at 88W wired (100% in 30 minutes) and 50W wireless, compared to the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W wired (50% in 30 minutes) and 23W wireless. The Mate 60 Pro also includes 20W reverse wireless charging. While the Pixel 8 Pro excels in longevity, the Mate 60 Pro prioritizes rapid replenishment. The Pixel 8 Pro’s ‘Bypass Charging’ feature, which reduces battery degradation, is also a notable advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 60 Pro if you need a phone that demonstrates cutting-edge hardware engineering and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience, and value fast charging. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prefer a seamless Android experience, industry-leading computational photography, and guaranteed software updates for years to come, and prioritize AI-powered features.