Huawei Mate 50E vs vivo S15 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo S15 Pro is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 8100 chipset delivers significantly faster performance than the Snapdragon 778G in the Mate 50E, translating to smoother multitasking and a better gaming experience. While the Mate 50E offers a respectable package, the S15 Pro’s performance advantage justifies the potential price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 50E | vivo S15 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 06 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 23 | Available. Released 2022, May 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.36 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~442 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers (closed type) |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 80W wired, 70% in 18 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4460 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Purple | Blue, Black |
| Models | CET-AL60 | V2207A |
| Price | About 580 EUR | About 480 EUR |
Huawei Mate 50E
- Familiar Huawei User Interface
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Potentially Lower Price Point
- Less Powerful Snapdragon 778G Chipset
- Slower Charging Speed (66W)
- Potential Software Restrictions
vivo S15 Pro
- Significantly Faster Dimensity 8100 Chipset
- Ultra-Fast 80W Wired Charging
- Streamlined Android Experience
- Potentially Higher Price
- No Reverse Wireless Charging
- Less Brand Recognition (in some markets)
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely feature OLED panels. The vivo S15 Pro, being a more recent release, may benefit from advancements in panel technology, potentially offering higher peak brightness and improved color accuracy. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests standard refresh rate implementations, impacting power efficiency during dynamic content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is challenging. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature multi-camera systems. The S15 Pro, positioned as a more premium device, likely incorporates a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. While both phones may offer similar features like night mode and portrait mode, the S15 Pro’s superior processing power allows for faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) makes it difficult to assess video recording capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo S15 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (5nm) significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 50E’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 8100’s octa-core configuration, with four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.85 GHz, provides a substantial CPU performance boost compared to the Mate 50E’s single 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 core. The 5nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 8100 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, meaning sustained performance under load is likely higher. Gamers and power users will unequivocally benefit from the S15 Pro’s superior processing capabilities.
Battery Life
The vivo S15 Pro’s 80W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Huawei Mate 50E’s 66W charging. The S15 Pro claims a 70% charge in just 18 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging speed of the S15 Pro mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Mate 50E also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature for topping up accessories, which the S15 Pro lacks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 50E if you prioritize a familiar Huawei user experience, value brand loyalty, and are comfortable with potential software limitations due to ongoing geopolitical factors. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks. Buy the vivo S15 Pro if you demand faster performance for gaming or demanding applications, appreciate quicker charging speeds, and prefer a more streamlined Android experience without the complexities of Huawei’s ecosystem.