Huawei Mate 50E vs Realme GT Neo 3T: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT Neo 3T emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset delivers significantly faster processing and graphics performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the Mate 50E offers a respectable experience, it can't match the GT Neo 3T's speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 50E | Realme GT Neo 3T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 06 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 23 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.36 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~442 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 80W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4460 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Purple | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | CET-AL60 | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 580 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 50E
- Potentially better image processing due to Huawei’s software.
- Refined Huawei software experience.
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups.
- Significantly weaker chipset performance compared to the GT Neo 3T.
- Limited information on display quality.
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Superior performance with the Snapdragon 870.
- Faster 80W wired charging.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users.
- Camera performance may rely more on hardware than software optimization.
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 803 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors compared to the Mate 50E (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the 'infinite' contrast ratio of the GT Neo 3T, the GT Neo 3T’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Bezels and color accuracy are not specified, but Realme typically focuses on vibrant, saturated colors, while Huawei aims for more natural tones.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Huawei’s historical strength in computational photography, the Mate 50E may offer more refined image processing, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The GT Neo 3T likely prioritizes speed and versatility. The absence of detail suggests neither phone features a standout camera system, focusing instead on all-around competence.
Performance
This is where the GT Neo 3T truly shines. The Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Mate 50E’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 870 features a Kryo 585 core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the 778G’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78. This translates to a significant performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 7nm process node of the 870 also offers better power efficiency, potentially mitigating the performance gap under sustained load. While both phones likely feature ample RAM, the GT Neo 3T’s superior chipset will be the limiting factor for demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Mate 50E’s smaller battery (size unspecified). However, the GT Neo 3T’s 80W wired charging significantly outperforms the Mate 50E’s 66W charging. This means the GT Neo 3T can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. The 5W reverse wired charging on the Mate 50E is a niche feature, useful for topping up accessories but unlikely to be a primary selling point.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 50E if you prioritize a refined software experience within the Huawei ecosystem and value a balanced feature set. It’s a good choice for everyday users who don’t heavily rely on mobile gaming or intensive tasks. Buy the Realme GT Neo 3T if you demand maximum performance for gaming, multitasking, and future-proofing. It’s the clear winner for power users and those seeking the best value in terms of raw speed.