Huawei Mate 50E vs Oppo Reno8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno8 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 8100 Max chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Snapdragon 778G in the Mate 50E, coupled with faster 80W charging. While Huawei’s software experience remains a consideration, the Reno8 Pro’s raw power and charging speed make it the more compelling choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 50E | Oppo Reno8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 06 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 23 | Available. Released 2022, July 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.36 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~442 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4460 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Purple | Glazed Green, Glazed Black, House of the Dragon |
| Models | CET-AL60 | CPH2357 |
| Price | About 580 EUR | ₹ 28,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 718351 (v9) GeekBench: 3395 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 50E
- Potentially more familiar software experience (depending on region)
- Solid all-around performance for everyday tasks
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Reno8 Pro
- Slower charging speeds
- Limited information on display quality
Oppo Reno8 Pro
- Significantly faster performance with Dimensity 8100 Max
- 80W SuperVOOC charging for rapid replenishment
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Oppo’s ColorOS may not appeal to all users
- Potential for software bloatware
- No significant camera advantage without detailed sensor specs
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno8 Pro’s display boasts a measured peak brightness of 818 nits, suggesting a more vibrant and visible experience in direct sunlight compared to the Mate 50E, for which display brightness data is unavailable. While both feature infinite (nominal) contrast ratios, the Reno8 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Without detailed color accuracy data for the Mate 50E, it’s difficult to assess color performance, but Oppo generally delivers well-calibrated displays in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for both. However, the chipset advantage of the Reno8 Pro likely translates to superior image processing capabilities. The Dimensity 8100 Max’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced, enabling faster processing and potentially better low-light performance. Without specific sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Reno8 Pro’s processing power gives it an edge. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for video recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno8 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Max, built on a 5nm process, significantly outperforms the Huawei Mate 50E’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 8100 Max features a more aggressive core configuration – four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.85 GHz versus the Mate 50E’s single 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and three 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and a more capable gaming experience. The Reno8 Pro is likely to exhibit less thermal throttling under sustained load due to the more efficient 5nm node.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Reno8 Pro’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 45% charge in just 10 minutes and fully charge in 31 minutes, while the Mate 50E’s 66W charging is slower. This faster charging significantly reduces downtime and provides a more convenient user experience. The Mate 50E also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature also present on the Reno8 Pro, allowing it to top up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 50E if you prioritize a familiar, albeit potentially limited, software ecosystem and value a slightly more conservative design. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks. Buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro if you demand superior performance for gaming and demanding applications, and if rapid charging is a high priority. It’s the better choice for power users and those who frequently multitask.