Huawei Mate 50E vs Mate 40 Pro: A Clash of Generations
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Mate 40 Pro remains the stronger contender overall, boasting a superior chipset, wireless charging, and a generally more premium feel. However, the Mate 50E offers a more modern design and potentially better software support, making it a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers seeking a reliable Huawei experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 50E | Huawei Mate 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 06 | 2020, October 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 23 | Available. Released 2020, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.36 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 75.5 x 9.1 mm (Glass) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~442 ppi density) | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Kirin 9000 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G78 MP24 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 20 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4460 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Purple | Mystic Silver, White, Black, Green, Yellow |
| Models | CET-AL60 | NOH-NX9, NOH-AN00, NOH-AN01 |
| Price | About 580 EUR | About 790 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 686835 (v8) GeekBench: 3704 (v5.1) GFXBench: 43fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 50E
- Modern Design
- Good Value
- Decent Performance for Everyday Tasks
- 66W Wired Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset
- No Wireless Charging
- Potentially Less Software Support
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
- Flagship Performance (Kirin 9000)
- Superior Camera System
- Wireless Charging
- Excellent Display
- Premium Build Quality
- Older Model (Potential Software Support Concerns)
- Higher Price
- Battery Age (Potential Degradation)
Display Comparison
The Mate 40 Pro's display shines with its impressive 807 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio, offering a vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The Mate 50E likely has a good display, but lacks the same level of measured brightness and contrast. While both offer OLED panels, the Mate 40 Pro's display is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Mate 40 Pro's flagship status translates to a more advanced setup. While specific camera specs are not fully detailed, the Kirin 9000's image signal processor (ISP) generally offers better image processing capabilities. The Mate 50E will still take good photos, but the Mate 40 Pro is likely to deliver superior image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
Here, the Mate 40 Pro's Kirin 9000 5G chipset takes a clear lead. Its 5nm architecture and higher clock speeds provide significantly faster performance than the Mate 50E's Snapdragon 778G 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the Mate 40 Pro.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive endurance ratings (97h), suggesting excellent battery life. The Mate 40 Pro has a slight edge with 50W wireless charging, offering added convenience. The Mate 50E's 66W wired charging is still fast, but lacks the flexibility of wireless charging.
Buying Guide
The Huawei Mate 50E is ideal for users prioritizing a stylish design, decent performance for everyday tasks, and a more affordable price point. The Mate 40 Pro is best suited for those who demand flagship-level performance, a top-tier camera system, and appreciate features like wireless charging, even if it means a higher investment.