Huawei Mate 50E vs Google Pixel 4 XL: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Pixel 4 XL offers a superior camera experience and a more polished software experience, despite its age. The Mate 50E provides faster charging and a more modern chipset, making it a compelling choice for budget-conscious users. Ultimately, the Pixel wins for image quality, but the Mate 50E offers better value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 50E | Google Pixel 4 XL |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 06 | 2019, October 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 23 | Available. Released 2019, October 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.5 x 76.1 x 8 mm (6.36 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~442 ppi density) | 1440 x 3040 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~537 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz | P-OLED, 90Hz, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 640 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1.22µm, no AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 18W wired, PD2.0 Wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4460 mAh | Li-Po 3700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Purple | Clearly White, Just Black, Oh So Orange |
| Models | CET-AL60 | G020P, G020, GA01181-US, GA01182-US, GA01180-US |
| Price | About 580 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 364.52 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 274.99 |
| RENEWED | - | $ 149.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.9 / Crosstalk -94.1 |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 73h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 80dB / Noise 78dB / Ring 88dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 323305 (v7), 403267 (v8) GeekBench: 10171 (v4.4), 2267 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 50E
- Faster Charging (66W)
- Modern Chipset (Snapdragon 778G)
- Larger Display
- Generally more affordable
- Camera not as good as Pixel 4 XL
- 60Hz display
- Software support may be limited
Google Pixel 4 XL
- Superior Camera Quality
- Clean Android Experience
- 90Hz Display
- Excellent Battery Life (though aging)
- Older Device (potential battery degradation)
- Slower Charging (18W)
- Less Powerful Chipset compared to newer devices
- No longer receiving software updates
Display Comparison
The Pixel 4 XL boasts a 6.3-inch OLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The Mate 50E features a 6.7-inch OLED display, likely with a standard 60Hz refresh rate. While the Mate 50E has a larger screen, the Pixel 4 XL's higher refresh rate provides a noticeably smoother experience.
Camera Comparison
This is where the Pixel 4 XL truly shines. Its camera is renowned for its exceptional image processing and computational photography capabilities. The Mate 50E's camera is decent, but it lacks the Pixel's advanced features and overall image quality. The Pixel's Night Sight is a significant advantage.
Performance
The Snapdragon 855 in the Pixel 4 XL still holds up well, offering flagship-level performance for everyday tasks and gaming. The Snapdragon 778G in the Mate 50E is a capable mid-range chipset, providing smooth performance for most users, but it won't match the raw power of the 855. The Pixel's CPU also has a slightly higher clock speed.
Battery Life
The Pixel 4 XL's endurance rating of 73h is impressive, suggesting excellent battery life. However, being an older device, battery degradation is a concern. The Mate 50E's 66W charging is a significant advantage, allowing for much faster top-ups. While the Pixel has wireless charging, the Mate 50E's wired charging is considerably faster.
Buying Guide
The Huawei Mate 50E is ideal for users seeking a reliable, affordable phone with good performance and fast charging. The Google Pixel 4 XL is best suited for photography enthusiasts who prioritize image quality and a clean Android experience, understanding its age and potential battery limitations.