Huawei P50E vs Mate 40E: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Huawei P50E emerges as the better choice. While it lacks 5G connectivity, the Snapdragon 778G’s 6nm process offers excellent efficiency, and its 66W charging significantly outperforms the Mate 40E’s 40W wired and wireless options. The performance difference isn't massive, but the P50E delivers a more modern and convenient charging experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 40E | Huawei P50E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 10 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 18 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 72.5 x 8.8 mm (6.24 x 2.85 x 0.35 in) | 156.5 x 73.8 x 7.9 mm (6.16 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~402 ppi density) | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~456 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.7 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.5 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 670) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990E 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP14 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | HarmonyOS 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K, 720p@240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired 40W wireless 5W reverse wired | 66W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, White, Black | Galaxy Blue, Cocoa Tea Gold, Snow White, Obsidian Black |
| Models | OCE-AN50 | ABR-AL60 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 580 EUR |
Huawei Mate 40E
- 5G Connectivity
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance
- Wireless Charging Support
- Less efficient 7nm+ process
- Slower 40W charging
- Potential for thermal throttling
Huawei P50E
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 778G
- Significantly faster 66W charging
- Likely better sustained performance
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Potentially lower peak CPU performance
- Relies on Qualcomm chipset
Display Comparison
Neither Huawei provides detailed display specs in the provided data. However, given their market positioning, both likely feature OLED panels. The P50E’s later release suggests a potential for improved color calibration and brightness. The absence of high refresh rate information is notable; assuming 60Hz for both is reasonable. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of the era.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, Huawei’s image processing is a key differentiator. Both phones likely employ multi-camera systems, but the P50E’s later release could indicate improvements in computational photography algorithms. The absence of information on Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is a gap; its presence would be a significant advantage for low-light photography. We can assume both phones offer a similar range of shooting modes, but the P50E’s image processing might be more refined.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Kirin 990E 5G (7nm+) in the Mate 40E boasts a more complex CPU configuration – a mix of Cortex-A76 cores – aiming for higher peak performance. However, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G (6nm) in the P50E benefits from a more efficient manufacturing process. This 6nm node translates to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. While the Kirin 990E might win in short bursts, the Snapdragon 778G will likely maintain higher average frame rates during extended gaming sessions. The P50E’s 4G limitation is a significant drawback for users in 5G areas.
Battery Life
The charging speeds are a clear win for the P50E. Its 66W wired charging dramatically reduces charging times compared to the Mate 40E’s 40W wired and 40W wireless options. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 778G’s efficiency likely allows the P50E to achieve comparable or even better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery. The Mate 40E’s 5W reverse wired charging is a niche feature, useful for topping up accessories but not a primary selling point.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 40E if you absolutely require 5G connectivity and prioritize the Kirin 990E’s potentially higher peak CPU performance in specific, demanding tasks. Buy the Huawei P50E if you value faster charging, a more efficient processor, and a generally smoother user experience, even if it means sacrificing 5G and accepting a slightly less powerful CPU.