Huawei Mate 40E 4G vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X3 Pro emerges as the stronger contender overall, thanks to its superior Snapdragon 860 chipset offering significantly better performance and faster charging. While the Mate 40E 4G boasts a refined design and Huawei's strengths, the Poco X3 Pro delivers more power for the price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 40E 4G | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 28 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 29 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 72.5 x 8.8 mm (6.24 x 2.85 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.7 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990E (7 nm+) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP14 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K, 720p@240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired 40W wireless 5W reverse wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, White, Black | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | OCE-AL50 | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 550 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 453223 (v8) GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 40E 4G
- Premium design and build quality
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Huawei's software features (region dependent)
- Wireless charging
- Reverse wireless charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging compared to Poco X3 Pro
- Availability may be limited in some regions
- Potentially lower brightness display
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Superior performance thanks to Snapdragon 860
- Excellent battery life and fast charging
- Competitive price
- High refresh rate display (likely)
- Good value for money
- Less premium design
- Camera may not match Huawei's image processing
- Software experience may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting good image depth. The Poco X3 Pro likely has a slightly brighter display and potentially a higher refresh rate (often 120Hz), leading to smoother visuals. The Mate 40E 4G's display is likely OLED, offering better color accuracy and deeper blacks, but potentially less brightness.
Camera Comparison
Huawei has historically excelled in camera technology. The Mate 40E 4G likely offers superior image processing and potentially better low-light performance, although specific camera specs are missing. The Poco X3 Pro's camera is competent, but likely doesn't match the Mate 40E 4G's potential in image quality, especially in challenging conditions. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860 is a clear winner here. It's a significantly more powerful chipset than the Kirin 990E, providing noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The Poco X3 Pro handles demanding games with ease, while the Mate 40E 4G might struggle with the highest settings.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 112h, suggesting exceptional battery life. Coupled with its 33W fast charging (reaching 59% in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes), it offers a significant advantage in battery performance over the Mate 40E 4G's 40W wired and wireless charging.
Buying Guide
The Huawei Mate 40E 4G is ideal for users prioritizing a premium design, Huawei's software experience (if available in your region), and potentially better camera image processing. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the go-to choice for gamers, power users, and those seeking exceptional performance and fast charging on a budget.