Oppo Find X3 Neo vs Huawei Mate 40E 4G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Neo is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage, particularly in demanding tasks and gaming. While the Mate 40E 4G offers competitive features like wireless charging, the X3 Neo’s faster 65W wired charging and overall processing power make it the winner.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 40E 4G | Oppo Find X3 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 28 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 29 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.6 x 72.5 x 8.8 mm (6.24 x 2.85 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.7 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990E (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP14 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K, 720p@240fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired 40W wireless 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 35 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, White, Black | Galactic Silver, Starlight Black |
| Models | OCE-AL50 | CPH2207 |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 180 EUR |
Huawei Mate 40E 4G
- Wireless charging support
- Reverse wired charging
- Huawei ecosystem integration
- Slower charging speeds
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 865
Oppo Find X3 Neo
- Faster 65W wired charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Superior GPU performance for gaming
- No wireless charging
- Relies on ColorOS instead of EMUI
Display Comparison
Neither Huawei nor Oppo specified display details beyond resolution in their marketing materials. However, both devices likely utilize AMOLED panels given the flagship aspirations. The key difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Snapdragon 865 in the Find X3 Neo has a more powerful ISP, potentially leading to better image processing for display output. While both are 7nm+ chips, the Snapdragon 865’s architecture is optimized for higher sustained performance, which could translate to smoother animations and a more responsive user interface.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor specifications, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature multi-camera setups aimed at versatility. The Snapdragon 865’s image signal processor (ISP) is a key advantage for the Find X3 Neo, enabling faster image processing, better dynamic range, and improved low-light performance. The Kirin 990E’s ISP is capable, but generally lags behind Qualcomm’s offerings in terms of computational photography. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests neither phone is aiming to compete with dedicated camera flagships.
Performance
The Oppo Find X3 Neo’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G chipset is the clear winner in this category. While both chips are fabricated on a 7nm+ process, the Snapdragon 865 features a newer Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, compared to the Mate 40E 4G’s 2.86 GHz Cortex-A76. The Snapdragon 865 also boasts a more powerful Adreno 650 GPU, offering significantly better graphics performance. The Kirin 990E’s octa-core configuration, with its mix of A76 and A55 cores, is competent, but it can’t match the Snapdragon’s sustained performance under heavy load. This difference is particularly noticeable in graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X3 Neo’s 65W SuperVOOC 2.0 charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 35 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Huawei Mate 40E 4G’s 40W wired and 40W wireless charging. While the Mate 40E 4G offers the convenience of wireless charging and 5W reverse wired charging, the X3 Neo’s speed is a major advantage for users who prioritize minimizing downtime. Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but the charging speed difference is substantial enough to offset any potential capacity disparity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 40E 4G if you prioritize wireless charging and are deeply embedded in the Huawei ecosystem, potentially benefiting from seamless integration with other Huawei devices. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Neo if you prioritize raw performance, faster charging speeds, and a more open Android experience without Google Mobile Services concerns.