Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design vs. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra emerges as the stronger contender. Its 67W wired and wireless charging, coupled with a comparable endurance rating, offers a more convenient experience. However, the Mate 40 RS Porsche Design’s unique design and Kirin 9000’s efficiency still hold appeal for specific users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 22 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, November 04 | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.5 x 10.1 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.40 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 234 g (8.25 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| SFS 1.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 1.1” AMOLED selfie display |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/4.4, 240mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 20 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass, infrared thermometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Collector Edition | Ceramic White (Cosmic White), Ceramic Black (Cosmic Black) |
| Models | NOP-AN00 | M2102K1G, M2102K1C |
| Price | About 1400 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 688720 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design
- Unique Porsche Design aesthetic
- Potentially more efficient Kirin 9000 chipset
- Fast 66W wired charging
- Limited access to Google services
- Lack of detailed camera specifications
- Slower wireless charging than Mi 11 Ultra
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- Exceptional camera system
- Industry-leading 67W wired and wireless charging
- Open Android experience with Google services
- Snapdragon 888 can be prone to throttling
- Larger and heavier design
- Potential for software bloat
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 943 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Mate 40 RS, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize high-quality AMOLED panels, the Mi 11 Ultra’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a superior ability to render deep blacks. The absence of refresh rate information for the Mate 40 RS suggests it may not match the smoother experience potentially offered by a higher refresh rate panel on the Mi 11 Ultra, a common feature in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra’s camera system is its defining feature. While specific sensor details are missing, the emphasis on ‘Photo / Video’ suggests a versatile and high-performing setup. The Mate 40 RS Porsche Design also focuses on camera capabilities, but without detailed specifications, it’s difficult to assess its strengths. The Mi 11 Ultra’s larger sensor size (likely) and advanced image processing algorithms will likely result in superior low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of information regarding the Mate 40 RS’s lens apertures and OIS capabilities hinders a direct comparison.
Performance
Both the Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design and the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra are powered by 5nm chipsets, but their architectures differ significantly. The Mi 11 Ultra’s Snapdragon 888 5G features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, designed for peak performance, while the Mate 40 RS utilizes the Kirin 9000 5G with a Cortex-A77 prime core at 3.13 GHz. While the Kirin’s clock speed is higher, the Cortex-X1 in the Snapdragon 888 generally offers superior single-core performance. The Snapdragon 888 is known to generate more heat under sustained load, potentially leading to throttling, a factor the Kirin 9000’s architecture might mitigate. Both devices utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the specific speed isn’t provided, impacting overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 95 hours, indicating comparable real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. However, the charging speeds are where the Mi 11 Ultra truly shines. Its 67W wired charging, capable of a full charge in 36 minutes, and 67W wireless charging (39 minutes) significantly outperform the Mate 40 RS’s 66W wired, 50W wireless, and 5W reverse wireless charging capabilities. This faster charging translates to less downtime and greater convenience for Mi 11 Ultra users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design if you value a distinctive, luxurious design aesthetic and prefer a potentially more efficient chipset in the Kirin 9000, even if it means navigating the limitations of the Huawei ecosystem. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra if you prioritize a class-leading camera system, exceptionally fast charging speeds (both wired and wireless), and a more open Android experience with guaranteed access to Google services.