Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the user prioritizing raw processing power and a unique, luxurious design, the Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design holds an edge. However, the Google Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip offers a compelling blend of AI-driven features and a smoother, more consistently optimized software experience, making it the better choice for most users in 2024.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 22 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, November 04 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.5 x 10.1 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.40 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 234 g (8.25 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| SFS 1.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/4.4, 240mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 20 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) | - |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass, infrared thermometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Collector Edition | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | NOP-AN00 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 1400 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design
- Significantly faster 66W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Luxurious Porsche Design aesthetic
- Potentially stronger sustained multi-core CPU performance
- Software updates are less frequent and reliable
- Limited global availability due to geopolitical factors
- Camera relies more on optical quality than computational photography
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Guaranteed software updates directly from Google
- Superior computational photography and AI features
- Cleaner and more optimized Android experience
- Slower 23W wired and wireless charging
- Less distinctive design compared to the Porsche Design model
- Tensor chip’s peak performance may be lower than Kirin 9000 in some scenarios
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Mate 40 RS Porsche Design’s display specifications aren’t explicitly stated, Huawei flagships typically prioritize color accuracy and vibrancy. The Pixel 6 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, stemming from its OLED panel, delivers deep blacks and a more immersive viewing experience. Both devices likely utilize high refresh rate panels, though the Pixel 6 Pro’s adaptive refresh rate (LTPO) offers more granular control and potential power savings.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is heavily reliant on Google’s computational photography prowess, leveraging the Tensor chip’s AI capabilities. While specific sensor sizes aren’t provided, the Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation. The Mate 40 RS Porsche Design, known for its Leica-engineered camera system, likely prioritizes color science and optical quality. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Mate 40 RS Porsche Design makes a direct sensor comparison difficult, but Huawei flagships typically feature large sensors and advanced optical image stabilization (OIS). The Pixel 6 Pro’s focus on software-driven enhancements gives it an edge in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design utilizes the Kirin 9000 5G, a 5nm chip with a tri-cluster CPU configuration featuring a high-clocked Cortex-A77 core at 3.13 GHz. The Google Pixel 6 Pro, however, is powered by Google’s Tensor chip, also built on a 5nm process. While the Tensor’s Cortex-X1 cores (2.80 GHz) offer higher peak performance, the Kirin 9000’s more numerous A77 cores may provide sustained multi-core performance advantages. The Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip excels in AI and machine learning tasks, impacting features like voice recognition and image processing. Both devices likely feature LPDDR5 RAM, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s software optimization may lead to more efficient memory management.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Mate 40 RS). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design supports a blazing-fast 66W wired charging, capable of significantly reducing charge times, alongside 50W wireless charging. The Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging, while supporting PD3.0, is considerably slower. The Pixel 6 Pro also offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, mirroring the Mate 40 RS Porsche Design’s capabilities. The Mate 40 RS Porsche Design’s charging speed is a significant advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 40 RS Porsche Design if you need a statement piece with exceptionally fast 66W wired and 50W wireless charging, and are comfortable with a potentially less-updated software experience. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a cleaner Android experience, cutting-edge computational photography, and guaranteed software updates directly from Google, even if charging speeds are comparatively slower.