Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro emerges as the more practical choice. Its Snapdragon 888 offers wider software compatibility and a generally more consistent performance profile, while the 81-hour endurance rating suggests comparable battery life despite a potentially smaller capacity. The Mate 40 Pro+ remains compelling for those deeply invested in the Huawei ecosystem, but faces software limitations.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 22 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, November 01 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.5 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| SFS 1.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/4.4, 240mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 20 MP, f/2.4, 14mm (ultrawide), PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | NOP-AN00 | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 1400 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
- Potentially superior low-light camera performance
- Faster wireless charging (50W)
- Unique HarmonyOS features (for Huawei ecosystem users)
- Software limitations due to US sanctions
- Less widespread app compatibility
- Uncertain thermal management
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Wider software compatibility (Snapdragon)
- Brighter, more vibrant display
- Excellent battery endurance (81h rating)
- Snapdragon 888 can throttle under heavy load
- Wireless charging slower than Mate 40 Pro+
- May lack the unique camera features of the Mate 40 Pro+
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 774 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Mate 40 Pro+’s display specs aren’t explicitly stated, Huawei typically prioritizes color accuracy. Both likely utilize OLED panels, but the Find X3 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a more refined panel. The lack of detailed refresh rate information for the Mate 40 Pro+ means the Find X3 Pro likely has an advantage in smoothness, assuming it supports a higher refresh rate (common for this class of device).
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as camera powerhouses, but their approaches differ. The Mate 40 Pro+ likely features a more complex multi-camera system, potentially with larger sensors, focusing on computational photography. The Find X3 Pro’s camera system, while excellent, is more focused on natural color reproduction and versatility. Without specific sensor size details for the Mate 40 Pro+, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Huawei’s history suggests a focus on maximizing sensor size and optical stabilization. Both are capable of excellent photo and video, but the Mate 40 Pro+ may excel in challenging low-light scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, designed for peak performance. The Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ utilizes the Kirin 9000 (5nm) with a Cortex-A77 prime core at 3.13 GHz. While the Kirin’s clock speed is higher, the Cortex-X1 in the Snapdragon 888 generally offers superior sustained performance due to architectural improvements. Both utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but thermal management will be key; the Snapdragon 888 is known to throttle under sustained load, but the Kirin 9000’s thermal profile is less documented. The Snapdragon’s Adreno 660 GPU likely provides a more consistent gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X3 Pro has an endurance rating of 81 hours, indicating strong battery life despite not specifying the battery capacity. The Mate 40 Pro+’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 66W wired charging significantly competes with the Find X3 Pro’s 65W wired charging (with a 40% charge in 10 minutes claim). The Find X3 Pro also offers 30W wireless charging, faster than the Mate 40 Pro+'s 50W wireless, and both support reverse wireless charging, albeit at lower wattages (10W vs 5W). The faster wireless charging on the Mate 40 Pro+ is a notable advantage, but the Find X3 Pro’s overall endurance suggests efficient power management.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ if you prioritize a unique camera system with potentially superior low-light performance and are comfortable navigating the limitations of the HarmonyOS ecosystem. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you value a smoother, more universally compatible Android experience, faster charging speeds, and a brighter, vibrant display, making it ideal for media consumption and gaming.