Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user in 2024, the Google Pixel 6 Pro is the more sensible choice. While the Mate 40 Pro+ boasts faster 66W charging and a potentially higher peak CPU clock speed, the Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip delivers superior AI-powered features and a guaranteed software support lifecycle, making it the more future-proof option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 22 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, November 01 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, ceramic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.5 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| SFS 1.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/4.4, 240mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 20 MP, f/2.4, 14mm (ultrawide), PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) | - |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | NOP-AN00 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 1400 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
- Significantly faster wired and wireless charging.
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance.
- Mature and refined hardware design.
- Limited software update support.
- Potential geopolitical concerns regarding Huawei.
- Lack of guaranteed long-term app compatibility.
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Superior AI-powered features (Magic Eraser, Motion Mode).
- Guaranteed long-term software updates from Google.
- Seamless Android experience.
- Slower wired and wireless charging speeds.
- Tensor chip may not match Kirin 9000 in raw benchmarks.
- Larger form factor may not suit all users.
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro’s display achieves a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Mate 40 Pro+’s display specs aren’t explicitly provided, Huawei flagships typically prioritize color accuracy and vibrancy. The Pixel 6 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, indicative of its OLED panel, delivers deep blacks. Both devices likely utilize high refresh rate panels, though the Pixel 6 Pro’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts the refresh rate for improved efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the Mate 40 Pro+.
Camera Comparison
The camera systems are a key differentiator. While the Mate 40 Pro+ is known for its advanced camera setup, details are limited. The Pixel 6 Pro leverages Google’s computational photography expertise, powered by the Tensor chip. The Tensor enables features like Magic Eraser and Motion Mode, enhancing image quality and creative possibilities. The Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Without specific sensor details for the Mate 40 Pro+, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s software advantage is substantial.
Performance
Both the Kirin 9000 and Google Tensor are fabricated on a 5nm process, but their architectures differ significantly. The Kirin 9000 utilizes a Cortex-A77 based CPU cluster, with a prime core clocked at 3.13 GHz, aiming for peak performance. The Tensor chip, however, employs Cortex-X1 cores at 2.80 GHz, designed for sustained performance and AI tasks. The Tensor’s focus on machine learning gives it an edge in areas like voice recognition and image processing. While the Kirin 9000 may win in raw benchmark scores, the Tensor’s optimized software integration and AI capabilities translate to a smoother, more intelligent user experience. Both utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the specific speed isn't provided.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Mate 40 Pro+). However, the charging speeds are vastly different. The Mate 40 Pro+ supports 66W wired charging, significantly faster than the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging with PD3.0, capable of 50% charge in 30 minutes. The Mate 40 Pro+ also offers 50W wireless charging, dwarfing the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wireless charging. The Mate 40 Pro+ also includes 5W reverse wireless charging, a feature also present on the Pixel 6 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks and exceptionally fast wired and wireless charging, and are comfortable with a potentially limited software update path. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you value a seamless Android experience, cutting-edge AI features like Magic Eraser, and a guaranteed long-term software support commitment from Google, even if it means slightly slower charging speeds.