Huawei Mate 40 Pro vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and a more readily available software experience, the Oppo Find X3 Pro emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Snapdragon 888 offers broader compatibility and generally more consistent performance, while the Mate 40 Pro’s strength lies in its exceptional battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 40 Pro | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 22 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, November 01 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.5 x 9.1 mm (Glass) / 9.5mm (Leather) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 20 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic Silver, White, Black, Green, Yellow | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | NOH-NX9, NOH-AN00, NOH-AN01 | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 790 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 97h | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 686835 (v8) GeekBench: 3704 (v5.1) GFXBench: 43fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (97h endurance)
- Faster wireless charging (50W)
- Potentially superior low-light camera performance
- Slightly brighter display (807 nits)
- Software limitations due to Huawei’s restrictions
- Potential compatibility issues with certain apps
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Smoother, more universally compatible Android experience
- Snapdragon 888 offers strong all-around performance
- Faster wired charging (65W with PD)
- Excellent display color accuracy
- Shorter battery life (81h endurance)
- Snapdragon 888 prone to thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Both the Huawei Mate 40 Pro and Oppo Find X3 Pro feature curved OLED displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, but key differences exist. The Mate 40 Pro achieves a measured peak brightness of 807 nits, while the Find X3 Pro reaches 774 nits. While the difference isn’t massive, the Mate 40 Pro is marginally brighter, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Both utilize high refresh rates, though the specific rate isn't specified in the provided data. The Find X3 Pro’s display is notable for its color calibration, aiming for a more natural and accurate representation, while Huawei typically leans towards more saturated colors. The lack of LTPO technology in either device means refresh rate scaling isn't as dynamic as on newer flagships.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with sophisticated camera systems, but their approaches differ. While both are described as capable in 'Photo / Video', the provided data lacks specifics on sensor sizes or megapixel counts. Historically, Huawei has prioritized computational photography and large sensor sizes, often resulting in excellent low-light performance. Oppo, on the other hand, tends to focus on color science and natural-looking images. The absence of details on optical image stabilization (OIS) or lens apertures makes a precise comparison difficult. It’s safe to assume both offer versatile camera setups, but the Mate 40 Pro likely holds an edge in challenging lighting conditions due to Huawei’s established expertise in image processing.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Huawei Mate 40 Pro is powered by the Kirin 9000 5G, a 5nm chip with a complex CPU configuration – a 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core, three 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and four 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. The Oppo Find X3 Pro, conversely, utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, also a 5nm chip, but with a more streamlined octa-core setup: a 2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 prime core, three 2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and four 1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-X1 in the Snapdragon 888 generally provides a performance edge in single-core tasks, while the Kirin 9000’s more numerous A77 cores could offer advantages in multi-threaded workloads. However, the Snapdragon 888 is known to be more prone to thermal throttling under sustained load, a potential drawback for heavy gamers. The Find X3 Pro benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations and wider software support.
Battery Life
Battery life is a clear win for the Huawei Mate 40 Pro, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 97 hours compared to the Oppo Find X3 Pro’s 81 hours. This translates to nearly a full day of additional usage for the Mate 40 Pro. While the Find X3 Pro offers competitive charging speeds – 65W wired (0-40% in 10 minutes) and 30W wireless (100% in 80 minutes) – the Mate 40 Pro counters with 66W wired, 50W wireless, and even 5W reverse wireless charging. The faster wireless charging and superior endurance of the Mate 40 Pro make it the better choice for users who prioritize minimizing time spent tethered to a charger.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 40 Pro if you prioritize exceptional battery life and are comfortable with the Huawei ecosystem, potentially navigating the limitations of the AppGallery. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you value a smoother, more universally compatible Android experience, a vibrant display, and consistently strong performance across a wider range of applications and games.