Huawei Mate 40 Pro vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistently fast charging, the Huawei Mate 40 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 97-hour endurance rating and 66W wired charging significantly outperform the Pixel 6 Pro’s 84-hour rating and 23W charging. However, the Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip and software experience offer a compelling alternative for those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 40 Pro | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 22 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, November 01 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.5 x 9.1 mm (Glass) / 9.5mm (Leather) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 20 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic Silver, White, Black, Green, Yellow | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | NOH-NX9, NOH-AN00, NOH-AN01 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 790 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 97h | Endurance rating 84h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 686835 (v8) GeekBench: 3704 (v5.1) GFXBench: 43fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (97h endurance)
- Ultra-fast 66W wired charging
- Powerful Kirin 9000 5G chipset
- Unique waterfall display design
- Limited software support due to geopolitical factors
- Availability may be restricted
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Clean and updated Android experience
- Google Tensor chip with AI capabilities
- Excellent computational photography
- Guaranteed software updates
- Shorter battery life (84h endurance)
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Potential for software bugs in early Tensor iterations
Display Comparison
Both the Mate 40 Pro and Pixel 6 Pro feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. However, the Pixel 6 Pro edges out the Mate 40 Pro in peak brightness, reaching 846 nits compared to the Mate 40 Pro’s 807 nits. This difference, while not massive, will be noticeable in direct sunlight. Both phones likely employ PWM dimming for low-brightness control, but specific frequencies weren’t provided; users sensitive to flicker should investigate further. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger display size and curved edges offer a more immersive experience, while the Mate 40 Pro’s waterfall display provides a unique aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are capable of excellent photography, but approach it differently. The context data doesn’t provide enough detail to compare specific camera sensors, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s Tensor chip excels in computational photography, leveraging its machine learning capabilities for features like Magic Eraser and improved low-light performance. Huawei historically focused on hardware, and the Mate 40 Pro likely boasts a sophisticated multi-camera system with strong optical image stabilization. The Pixel 6 Pro’s software processing tends towards a more natural look, while Huawei’s often employs more aggressive sharpening and color boosting. Without detailed sensor specs, a definitive camera winner is difficult to declare, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s software advantages are significant.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Huawei Mate 40 Pro utilizes the Kirin 9000 5G, a 5nm chip with a tri-cluster CPU configuration featuring a high-clocked Cortex-A77 core at 3.13 GHz. The Google Pixel 6 Pro, conversely, is powered by Google’s own Tensor chip, also built on a 5nm process. While the Tensor features newer Cortex-X1 cores clocked at 2.80 GHz, the Kirin 9000’s more aggressive core configuration and mature architecture likely provide a slight edge in sustained CPU performance. The Tensor chip’s strength lies in its dedicated machine learning cores, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing. Both phones utilize ample RAM, though specific speeds weren’t provided, and both benefit from 5G connectivity.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate 40 Pro’s 97-hour endurance rating is a standout feature, significantly surpassing the Pixel 6 Pro’s 84-hour rating. This translates to a tangible difference in real-world usage, allowing the Mate 40 Pro to comfortably last through a full day of heavy use, and potentially two days for moderate users. Furthermore, the Mate 40 Pro’s 66W wired charging is dramatically faster than the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W charging, enabling a full charge in under an hour. The Mate 40 Pro also supports 50W wireless charging, while the Pixel 6 Pro offers 23W wireless charging. The Mate 40 Pro’s charging ecosystem is clearly superior.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 40 Pro if you need exceptional battery life, incredibly fast wired and wireless charging, and a proven track record of reliable performance. It’s ideal for power users and travelers who can’t always rely on convenient charging access. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prioritize a clean Android experience, cutting-edge computational photography, and seamless integration with Google’s services, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance and charging speed.