Huawei Mate 40 Pro 4G vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro emerges as the more practical choice. Its Snapdragon 888 offers broader 5G compatibility and a generally smoother software experience, coupled with comparable battery life and excellent charging speeds. The Mate 40 Pro’s Kirin 9000 is potent, but the 4G restriction and software ecosystem limitations are significant drawbacks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 40 Pro 4G | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 28 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 09 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.5 x 9.1 mm (Glass) / 9.5mm (Leather) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 20 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic Silver, White, Black, Green, Yellow | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | NOH-AL00, NOH-AL10 | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 40 Pro 4G
- Potentially faster CPU clock speed with Kirin 9000
- Faster 66W wired charging
- 50W wireless charging is faster than Oppo's
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Huawei’s app ecosystem restrictions
- Uncertainty regarding long-term software support
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- 5G connectivity with Snapdragon 888
- More open and widely supported software ecosystem
- Excellent display brightness and contrast
- Snapdragon 888 can be prone to thermal throttling
- Wireless charging is slower than Mate 40 Pro
- Image processing may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X3 Pro’s display achieves a measured peak brightness of 774 nits, providing excellent visibility in bright conditions. While the Mate 40 Pro’s display specs aren’t explicitly provided, Huawei is known for high-quality panels. Both likely utilize OLED technology, but the Find X3 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The Find X3 Pro’s display is likely to benefit users who consume a lot of HDR content or use their phones outdoors frequently.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having excellent photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The key differentiator will likely be image processing. Huawei historically emphasizes vibrant, saturated colors, while Oppo tends towards a more natural look. Without specific sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the presence of OIS on both devices suggests stable video recording. The lack of detail regarding secondary cameras (ultrawide, telephoto) makes a comprehensive comparison challenging.
Performance
Both devices utilize a 5nm fabrication process, but the chipsets differ significantly. The Oppo Find X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 888 features the Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, designed for peak performance, while the Huawei Mate 40 Pro 4G’s Kirin 9000 employs a cluster of Cortex-A77 cores, with the primary core at 3.13 GHz. While the Kirin 9000’s clock speed is higher, the Snapdragon 888’s architectural advantages and integrated 5G modem provide a more balanced and future-proof experience. The Snapdragon 888 is also known to be prone to thermal throttling under sustained load, a potential concern for gamers, though Oppo’s cooling solutions may mitigate this.
Battery Life
Both devices boast impressive endurance ratings, with the Oppo Find X3 Pro achieving 81 hours. The Mate 40 Pro 4G’s battery capacity isn’t specified, but its 66W wired charging and 50W wireless charging are competitive with the Find X3 Pro’s 65W wired (with 40% charge in 10 minutes) and 30W wireless charging. The faster wired charging on the Mate 40 Pro could be beneficial for users who frequently need a quick top-up, while the Find X3 Pro’s wireless charging is slightly slower but still very convenient.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 40 Pro 4G if you prioritize raw processing power for specific tasks and are comfortable within Huawei’s app ecosystem, and 4G connectivity is sufficient for your needs. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you value 5G connectivity, a more open software experience, and a consistently high-performing device without the limitations of the Huawei ecosystem.