Huawei Mate 40 Pro 4G vs Huawei P50 Pro: A Clash of Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The P50 Pro edges out the Mate 40 Pro thanks to its brighter display, dual chipset versatility (Kirin and Snapdragon), and potentially improved camera software. However, the Mate 40 Pro remains a strong contender with its excellent performance and established reputation. Ultimately, it depends on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 40 Pro 4G | Huawei P50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 28 | 2021, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 09 | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.5 x 9.1 mm (Glass) / 9.5mm (Leather) | 158.8 x 72.8 x 8.5 mm (6.25 x 2.87 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1344 x 2772 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~456 ppi density) | 1228 x 2700 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.76 inches, 115.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10, 90Hz | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 (5 nm) | Kirin 9000 (5 nm)Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 4G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G78 MP24Adreno 660 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 | HarmonyOS 2.0 (China), EMUI 14.2 (Europe), no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica optics, dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom, 7x lossless zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF 40 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (B/W), AF |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF 12 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 20 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 66W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless charging |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4360 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic Silver, White, Black, Green, Yellow | Golden Black, Cocoa Gold, Pearl White, Charm Pink |
| Models | NOH-AL00, NOH-AL10 | JAD-AL50, JAD-LX9, JAD-AL00 |
| Price | About 800 EUR | $ 196.62 / £ 329.00 / € 473.13 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 76h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 793876 (v8), 786215 (v9) GeekBench: 3145 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 40 Pro 4G
- Excellent performance
- Proven track record
- Fast charging
- Solid build quality
- Software limitations (due to US sanctions)
- Less vibrant display compared to P50 Pro
- Older model
Huawei P50 Pro
- Brighter display
- Dual chipset versatility (Kirin & Snapdragon)
- Potentially improved camera software
- Sleek design
- Software limitations (due to US sanctions)
- May have slightly shorter software support lifespan
- Price may be higher
Display Comparison
The P50 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 754 nits, significantly brighter than the Mate 40 Pro. While the Mate 40 Pro's display is excellent, the P50 Pro's higher brightness offers better outdoor visibility. The P50 Pro also boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio, though this is a nominal value.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature impressive camera systems, but the P50 Pro is generally considered to have a slight edge. While detailed camera comparisons require extensive testing, the P50 Pro's software optimizations and potentially improved sensor technology give it a slight advantage in image quality and video recording. Both offer excellent zoom capabilities.
Performance
Both phones utilize the Kirin 9000 chipset, offering flagship-level performance. However, the P50 Pro's inclusion of a Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G provides added versatility and potentially improved compatibility with certain apps and services. The CPU configurations are similar, suggesting comparable everyday performance.
Battery Life
Both phones boast impressive endurance ratings of 76 hours. Charging speeds are comparable with 66W wired and 50W wireless charging on both devices. Reverse wireless charging is also available on both.
Buying Guide
The Huawei Mate 40 Pro 4G is ideal for users prioritizing raw performance and a proven track record. The Huawei P50 Pro is a better fit for those who value a vibrant display, a more versatile camera system, and the potential benefits of a dual-chipset approach.