Huawei Mate 30 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset offers a slight edge in CPU and GPU performance, coupled with faster 50W wired charging and a comparable battery endurance rating. However, the Mate 30 Pro’s camera system remains highly competitive.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 30 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 Sub6 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2020, February 13. Released 2020, February 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 76.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 74.8 x 9 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~389 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.09 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.86 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 10, no Google Play Services | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Leica optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Triple-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, 5x hybrid zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.54", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired 27W wireless Reverse wireless | 50W wired, PD3.0 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Space Silver, Cosmic Purple, Emerald Green | Alpine White, Solstice Grey |
| Models | TAS-L09, TAS-L29, TAS-AL00, TAS-TL00 | M2001J1G |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 930 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 595246 (v8) GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 30
- Exceptional low-light camera performance
- Refined software experience (though limited by ecosystem)
- Competitive wireless charging speed (27W)
- Slightly slower processor compared to Snapdragon 865
- Limited access to Google services
- Slower wired charging (40W)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 865 processor
- Faster 50W wired charging with PD3.0
- Seamless 5G connectivity
- Camera image processing may not appeal to all users
- Software experience can be less refined than Huawei
- Reverse wireless charging is slower (5W)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro boasts a brighter display, peaking at 858 nits, compared to the Mate 30 Pro’s unspecified peak brightness. While both utilize OLED technology, the Mi 10 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The lack of high refresh rate on either device is a notable omission by today’s standards, but both offer vibrant colors and excellent viewing angles. The Mi 10 Pro’s brightness advantage is particularly beneficial for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones excel in photography, but approach it differently. While detailed sensor specs are missing, the Mate 30 Pro is renowned for its exceptional low-light capabilities and dynamic range, largely attributed to its sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Mi 10 Pro’s camera system, while also capable, leans towards a more natural color profile. Both offer versatile camera setups, but the Mi 10 Pro’s 5G connectivity allows for faster uploads of high-resolution photos and videos. The absence of detailed sensor information makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Mate 30 Pro’s reputation for camera prowess is well-established.
Performance
Both phones employ 7nm+ fabrication processes, but the chipsets differ significantly. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro’s Snapdragon 865 features a newer Cortex-A77 core (2.84 GHz) compared to the Mate 30 Pro’s Cortex-A76 (2.86 GHz). While clock speeds are similar, the architectural improvements in the A77 provide a performance advantage. The Snapdragon 865 also integrates a more powerful Adreno 650 GPU, offering superior graphics performance. Both devices feature ample RAM, but the Mi 10 Pro’s support for faster LPDDR5 RAM could contribute to snappier multitasking. The Kirin 990’s neural processing unit (NPU) is strong, but the Snapdragon 865’s overall system-on-chip (SoC) performance is generally superior.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 101 hours, indicating comparable battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified in the provided data). However, the charging speeds are a key differentiator. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro supports 50W wired charging with PD3.0, significantly faster than the Mate 30 Pro’s 40W wired charging. The Mi 10 Pro also offers 30W wireless charging, exceeding the Mate 30 Pro’s 27W. While both support reverse wireless charging, the Mi 10 Pro’s 5W output is less powerful than the Mate 30 Pro’s. The Mi 10 Pro’s faster charging capabilities provide a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 30 Pro if you prioritize a unique camera experience with exceptional low-light performance and are comfortable with the limitations of the Huawei ecosystem. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G if you value raw processing power, faster charging speeds, and seamless 5G connectivity, making it ideal for gamers and power users.