Huawei Mate 30 vs Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X2 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a more consistently powerful experience, coupled with the industry-leading 65W SuperVOOC charging. While the Mate 30 boasts a compelling camera, the Find X2 Pro’s overall package is more refined and future-proof.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 30 | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 76.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~389 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.09 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.86 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 10, no Google Play Services | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Leica optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.54", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired 27W wireless Reverse wireless | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Space Silver, Cosmic Purple, Emerald Green | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | TAS-L09, TAS-L29, TAS-AL00, TAS-TL00 | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 30
- Potentially superior computational photography
- Unique and recognizable design
- Reverse wireless charging
- Kirin 990 chipset may exhibit throttling under sustained load
- Lack of 5G connectivity
- Huawei ecosystem limitations
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 865 processor
- Industry-leading 65W SuperVOOC charging
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Camera image processing may be less aggressive than Huawei
- Software experience may not appeal to all users
- Potentially less distinctive design
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a significant advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 871 nits. While both phones utilize 7nm+ fabrication, the Find X2 Pro’s display offers an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting superior black levels. The Mate 30’s display specs are less detailed in the provided data, but it’s reasonable to assume it doesn’t match the Find X2 Pro’s brightness or contrast. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight and a more immersive viewing experience on the Oppo.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as camera-centric, but their approaches differ. The provided data doesn’t detail specific camera specs beyond ‘Photo / Video’ for both. However, Huawei historically excels in computational photography, leveraging AI to enhance image quality. The Mate 30 likely prioritizes scene recognition and post-processing. The Find X2 Pro, while also capable, likely focuses on delivering more natural-looking images with accurate color reproduction. Without sensor size or aperture data, a definitive camera winner is difficult to declare, but Huawei’s reputation in this area gives it a slight edge, assuming its software processing is preferred.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: Huawei’s Kirin 990 versus Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 865. The Snapdragon 865, with its Cortex-A77 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, generally outperforms the Kirin 990’s Cortex-A76 cores (2.86 GHz). While both are 7nm+ chips, Qualcomm’s architecture and GPU typically deliver superior sustained performance and gaming capabilities. The Find X2 Pro benefits from the Snapdragon’s 5G modem, offering future-proofing that the Mate 30 lacks. Both utilize similar RAM configurations, but the Snapdragon’s overall system-on-chip efficiency is a key differentiator.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 88 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the charging experience is where the Find X2 Pro shines. Its 65W SuperVOOC charging can fully charge the device in just 38 minutes, a significant advantage over the Mate 30’s 40W wired and 27W wireless charging. The Find X2 Pro also supports PD (Power Delivery), adding to its charging versatility. While the Mate 30 offers reverse wireless charging, the Find X2 Pro’s faster wired charging is more practical for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 30 if you prioritize a unique camera experience and are comfortable navigating the limitations of the Huawei ecosystem. Its strengths lie in its computational photography and distinctive design. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you value raw performance, blazing-fast charging, and a stunning display. It’s the better option for power users, gamers, and those who demand the latest technology.